A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Educators for America Act and was introduced in the Senate on July 16, 2026. It amends the requirements for teaching residency programs found under part A of title II of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Specifically, the legislation updates section 202(e)(2)(B)(ii) of the Higher Education Act of 1965. It changes how teaching residency programs establish criteria for selecting eligible individuals to participate. Finally, the bill adds a requirement to prioritize the recruitment and selection of individuals who are underrepresented in the teaching profession.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +4
Would men be better off under this?
The bill explicitly calls out men as an underrepresented group in the teaching profession targeted for priority recruitment.
- Scored +4
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill prioritizes the recruitment of underrepresented individuals in the teaching profession, which can support demographic equity.
- Scored +4
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
The legislation explicitly highlights the inclusion of men as a group underrepresented in teaching, supporting balanced representation.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2 of the bill adds a requirement to prioritize the recruitment and selection of eligible individuals who are underrepresented in the teaching profession, including men. This could be seen as positive because it aims to bring more diversity into the teaching workforce by actively focusing on groups that currently lack representation.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would men be better off under this? — The bill explicitly calls out men as an underrepresented group in the teaching profession targeted for priority recruitment. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Prioritizing recruitment of underrepresented individuals helps increase racial diversity within the teaching workforce. Would children be better off under this? — Improving diversity and recruitment in teaching residency programs can enhance the educational experience for students. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Targeting underrepresented groups in teaching residency programs supports greater Hispanic representation among educators. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Recruitment priorities include underrepresented groups, supporting Native American educators. Would students be better off under this? — A more diverse teaching workforce provides positive role models and perspectives for students. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults entering the teaching profession benefit from targeted recruitment initiatives for underrepresented groups. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The focus on underrepresented demographics can positively impact diverse communities entering education.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The legislation explicitly highlights the inclusion of men as a group underrepresented in teaching, supporting balanced representation. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill prioritizes the recruitment of underrepresented individuals in the teaching profession, which can support demographic equity.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill places additional federal requirements on teaching residency programs under the Higher Education Act.
- 7/16/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.