Ashley Moody (R-FL)
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act of 2026
A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act of 2026," aims to stop civil lawsuits against those who make or sell stone slab products. It prohibits actions for damages or relief resulting from the misuse of these products by others. Specifically, it targets lawsuits related to injuries like silicosis caused by dust during the fabrication process. The Act would prevent such cases from being brought in federal or state courts. Additionally, any such legal actions currently pending must be dismissed once the Act is passed.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +8
Would business owners be better off under this?
Directly shields manufacturers and sellers from significant legal liabilities.
- Scored +5
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
Protects sellers and distributors, including small retailers, from costly civil litigation regarding product fabrication.
- Scored +4
Does this make it easier to do business across state lines?
Prevents varying state court liability rulings from burdening the interstate stone slab trade.
The opposite· 3 of 6
- Scored -6
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
Mandates the dismissal of pending lawsuits, removing the judicial process for current claimants.
- Scored -5
Would union members be better off under this?
Workers exposed to silica dust during fabrication lose the right to sue manufacturers.
- Scored -5
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
People suffering from silicosis are deprived of legal recourse against sellers and manufacturers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for manufacturers and sellers: The bill seeks to protect businesses involved in the design, manufacture, marketing, and sale of stone slab products from being held liable for injuries caused by others who alter the products unsafely (Section 2(a)(4)).
-
Preservation of industry and jobs: The Act intends to preserve a lawful industry that currently employs tens of thousands of people across several states (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Legal system efficiency: By preventing what it describes as a proliferation of frivolous lawsuits, the bill aims to prevent the straining of legal resources and preserve the rights of other deserving parties (Section 2(a)(6)).
-
Consumer access: The bill aims to preserve the access of consumers to a supply of stone slab products (Section 2(b)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of legal recourse for injured workers: The bill would prohibit civil actions brought by workers suffering from silicosis or other conditions related to occupational exposure to crystalline silica generated during fabrication (Section 4(2)(A)).
-
Dismissal of current lawsuits: Any qualified civil action currently pending in court would be required to be dismissed as soon as is practicable after the Act is enacted (Section 3(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Directly shields manufacturers and sellers from significant legal liabilities. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — People suffering from silicosis are deprived of legal recourse against sellers and manufacturers. Would union members be better off under this? — Workers exposed to silica dust during fabrication lose the right to sue manufacturers. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Workers who may be injured by silica dust lose a potential source of financial recovery.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — Prevents varying state court liability rulings from burdening the interstate stone slab trade. Does this give the federal government more power? — Uses federal law to preempt state courts from hearing specific civil actions. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Mandates the dismissal of pending lawsuits, removing the judicial process for current claimants. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Restricts the ability of state courts to adjudicate liability claims for injured citizens.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Protects sellers and distributors, including small retailers, from costly civil litigation regarding product fabrication. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Protects the stone slab industry from liability, potentially preventing business closures and maintaining industry stability. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Limits the ability of injured parties to seek damages from manufacturers and sellers of stone slab products.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this make trade with other countries easier? — Reduces liability burdens on importers and foreign manufacturers of stone slabs.
- 6/16/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.