Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
Secure and Accountable Military AI Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Secure and Accountable Military AI Act of 2026 sets rules for how the Department of Defense can use artificial intelligence and autonomous weapon systems. It creates strict oversight, demanding senior official approval and testing before high-risk AI tools can be deployed. The bill also bans the military from using AI to launch nuclear weapons or track U.S. citizens without a lawful reason. Additionally, it requires tech contractors to quickly report security breaches or dangerous model behaviors to the government. Finally, the legislation establishes narrow exceptions for certain defense systems and gives Congress a say in approving advanced autonomous weapons.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +7
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
Places strict legal boundaries preventing military intelligence systems from performing pattern-of-life analysis or tracking citizens domestically.
- Scored +7
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?
Requires private defense contractors to quickly report security breaches and concerning AI behaviors, protecting sensitive technology.
- Scored +6
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
Requires extensive documentation, senior official written determinations, and formal notifications to Congress regarding high-consequence AI.
The opposite
- Scored -8
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?
Explicitly prohibits and restricts the military from using artificial intelligence for domestic person-based tracking and surveillance of U.S. citizens.
- Scored -2
Would business owners be better off under this?
Imposes heavy compliance, tracking, and reporting burdens on technology companies holding defense contracts.
- Scored -2
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
Compliance burdens and reporting rules for defense contractors could create administrative hurdles for smaller businesses working with the military.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protects Privacy and Civil Liberties: Section 6(a)(2) stops the military from using artificial intelligence to track, analyze, build dossiers on, or assign risk scores to U.S. citizens within the country unless specifically allowed by federal law.
-
Maintains Human Control Over War: Section 4(a) and Section 6(a)(1) establish that artificial intelligence cannot replace human judgment in decisions involving the use of force, detention, or nuclear weapons, ensuring that humans remain accountable for life-and-death choices.
-
Improves Cybersecurity Reporting: Section 5(c) requires private contractors to notify the government within 72 hours if they experience security breaches, data thefts, or concerning behaviors in frontier AI models, helping keep sensitive defense technology safe from adversaries.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
National Security Risks From Strict Rules: Section 3(b) and Section 3(c) require extensive testing, reviews, and written approvals before deploying high-consequence AI, which could potentially slow down the military's ability to quickly adopt critical defense technologies in a fast-moving crisis.
-
Compliance Burdens for Contractors: Section 5 places heavy reporting and tracking requirements on companies supplying AI models to the Department of Defense, which could create significant administrative hurdles and costs for businesses working with the military.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Places strict legal boundaries preventing military intelligence systems from performing pattern-of-life analysis or tracking citizens domestically. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires extensive documentation, senior official written determinations, and formal notifications to Congress regarding high-consequence AI. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Ensures human accountability and judgment remain central in decisions involving force, detention, and high-consequence operations. Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — Safeguards individuals by prohibiting the Department of Defense from using AI based solely on activities protected by the First Amendment. Does this give the federal government more power? — Expands federal oversight and departmental regulatory controls over military artificial intelligence deployments.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Strongly protects U.S. citizens' data by barring military AI from building dossiers, tracking individuals, or assigning predictive risk scores. Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — Imposes strict oversight, approval processes, and mandatory incident reporting requirements on developers of frontier AI models.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — The bill protects citizens from unauthorized military AI tracking and ensures activities protected by the First Amendment cannot be targeted.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Imposes heavy compliance, tracking, and reporting burdens on technology companies holding defense contracts.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Compliance burdens and reporting rules for defense contractors could create administrative hurdles for smaller businesses working with the military.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — Requires private defense contractors to quickly report security breaches and concerning AI behaviors, protecting sensitive technology. Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — Explicitly prohibits and restricts the military from using artificial intelligence for domestic person-based tracking and surveillance of U.S. citizens.
- 6/2/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- Introduced in Senate