A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The TRUST Act aims to improve the standards for immigration enforcement officers through stricter hiring and screening processes. It mandates more rigorous background checks, including reviews of criminal history, social media, and psychological suitability. The bill also establishes strict regulations for uniforms, identification, and the display of badges. Additionally, it requires the use of body-worn cameras for officers interacting with the public. The legislation includes specific protocols for camera activation, deactivation, and the public release of footage. Finally, it mandates specialized training in areas such as de-escalation, constitutional protections, and identity verification.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +6
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The mandate for body-worn cameras and the public release of footage increases accountability and transparency for law enforcement actions.
- Scored +5
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The bill requires training to recognize and appropriately respond to individuals experiencing disabilities or medical distress.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill mandates specialized training to prevent discriminatory enforcement based on race, ethnicity, or national origin.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The requirement for body-worn cameras and mandatory notifications of recording may impact the privacy of individuals during encounters.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Officer Integrity and Professionalism: By establishing strengthened hiring and screening standards, the bill aims to enhance the performance and integrity of officers (Section 2).
-
Enhanced Public Safety through Background Checks: Applicants must undergo comprehensive background investigations, which include checks for criminal history, domestic violence, sexual assault, and affiliations with violent or hate-based groups (Section 2).
-
Improved Suitability for Duty: Mandatory psychological suitability assessments are required to ensure officers have sound judgment and the ability to safely interact with the public (Section 2).
-
Increased Accountability through Body Cameras: The requirement for body-worn cameras helps document interactions between officers and the public (Section 6).
-
Clearer Officer Identification: Rules regarding the display of identification cards and badges ensure that the public can identify the specific agency and individual an officer belongs to (Section 3 and Section 4).
-
Prevention of Wrongful Detentions: Specialized training in identity verification is designed to prevent the wrongful detention of U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and Native Americans (Section 7).
-
Reduction of Unnecessary Force: Training in de-escalation techniques and safe civilian engagement is intended to protect public safety and reduce the risk of unnecessary force (Section 7).
-
Protection of Civil Rights: Specialized training covers constitutional protections and civil rights laws to prevent unlawful searches, seizures, and discriminatory enforcement (Section 7).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Privacy Concerns Regarding Body Cameras: Officers are required to notify subjects that they are being recorded, which may impact those who prefer privacy during encounters (Section 6).
-
Potential for Deactivation of Evidence: Officers have the authority to deactivate body-worn cameras during certain circumstances, such as when working on unrelated assignments or during administrative/tactical discussions (Section 6).
-
Reduced Privacy for Victims or Sources: An officer may ask to deactivate a camera when interacting with a crime victim or an anonymous source (Section 6).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill requires training to recognize and appropriately respond to individuals experiencing disabilities or medical distress. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes specialized training in identity verification specifically to prevent the wrongful detention of Native Americans.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill mandates specialized training to prevent discriminatory enforcement based on race, ethnicity, or national origin. Does this tighten control of the border? — The bill strengthens the professional standards and background checks for officers tasked with immigration enforcement.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The mandate for body-worn cameras and the public release of footage increases accountability and transparency for law enforcement actions. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The requirement for body-worn cameras and mandatory notifications of recording may impact the privacy of individuals during encounters.
- 5/20/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.