Tom Cotton (R-AR)

A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.

S. 4465 · Senate bill Armed Forces and National Security

A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor

Last activity — Became Public Law No: 119-87.

Became law

Passed both chambers and was signed by the President, or became law without a signature.

Nothing more in Congress: it is law. When it takes effect depends on the dates written into it — some parts start at once, others a year or more later.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Passed Senate voice vote
  3. Passed House 261–111
  4. To President
  5. Became Law

The Senate by voice vote (members called out yes or no together): no senator's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This Act aims to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. The primary purpose is to extend the authorities found in title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. It specifically changes the repeal date from April 30, 2026, to June 12, 2026. This change applies to both 50 U.S.C. 1881 note and 18 U.S.C. 2511 note. These amendments take effect on either the date the Act is enacted or April 29, 2026.

Yes

  • Scored +2

    Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?

    The bill extends the timeline for existing surveillance authorities under FISA Title VII.

  • Scored +1

    Does this change how police departments operate?

    The bill extends surveillance authorities used by intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Does this give people more control over their personal data?

    The extension of surveillance authorities may reduce individual privacy protections regarding data collection.

  • Scored -2

    Does this protect people from being watched or searched?

    The bill extends the period during which certain government surveillance authorities are active.

  • Scored -1

    Would people in cities be better off under this?

    Increased surveillance capabilities can impact privacy in densely populated areas.

What Congress actually voted on

One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.

  • The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not. Passed 261 yes · 111 no

    See who voted how →

    04/30/2026 · Roll call 155 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass”