A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Hemp Safety Enforcement Act," aims to amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. It allows States and Indian tribes to maintain their own specific definitions for hemp and hemp-derived cannabinoid products. Under this act, these entities can elect not to be subject to certain existing federal subtitles regarding hemp production. To qualify for this self-regulation, the State or Indian tribe must implement a minimum age requirement for purchasing hemp-derived cannabinoid products. The bill also addresses how interstate commerce and transportation function for these entities.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +7
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill grants states and Indian tribes the authority to opt out of federal subtitles and implement their own definitions and regulations for hemp.
- Scored +5
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill explicitly extends the authority to self-regulate hemp production and definitions to Indian tribes.
- Scored +4
Would children be better off under this?
The bill requires states and tribes to implement minimum age requirements for hemp-derived cannabinoid products.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this make it easier to do business across state lines?
The bill imposes a compliance burden where products must meet the differing laws of both the sending and receiving jurisdictions during interstate transport.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
State and Tribal Autonomy: States and Indian tribes can elect to have primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp and hemp-derived cannabinoid products by submitting a notice to the Secretary instead of a full plan. (Section 2(b)(1)(A)(i))
-
Consistent Definitions: This provision allows a State or Indian tribe to use its own specific terms for hemp and related products in its laws, providing more local control over definitions. (Section 2(a))
-
Protection of Interstate Commerce: The bill ensures that even if a State or tribe chooses self-regulation, it cannot prohibit the interstate commerce of hemp or hemp-derived cannabinoid products to or from its territory. (Section 2(b)(1)(A)(iii)(II))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Compliance Burdens for Interstate Commerce: When moving hemp or hemp-derived products between two entities that have both chosen self-regulation, the products must comply with the laws and regulations of both the sender and the receiver. (Section 2(b)(1)(A)(iii)(III))
-
Mandatory Age Restrictions: For a State or Indian tribe to successfully opt out of the existing subtitle and exercise self-regulation, they are required to implement a minimum age requirement for the purchase of hemp-derived cannabinoid products. (Section 2(b)(1)(A)(ii))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill explicitly extends the authority to self-regulate hemp production and definitions to Indian tribes. Would children be better off under this? — The bill requires states and tribes to implement minimum age requirements for hemp-derived cannabinoid products. Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill provides hemp producers in states and tribes more autonomy over how their products are defined and regulated locally.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill grants states and Indian tribes the authority to opt out of federal subtitles and implement their own definitions and regulations for hemp. Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — The bill imposes a compliance burden where products must meet the differing laws of both the sending and receiving jurisdictions during interstate transport.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill allows states and tribes to implement their own regulatory frameworks for hemp, which can provide more local flexibility for businesses.
- 4/16/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota