Charles Schumer (D-NY)
Family Grocery and Farmer Relief Act
A Democratic bill with 13 Democratic cosponsors · See all 14 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S883-887)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Family Grocery and Farmer Relief Act aims to restore competition in the meatpacking industry by reducing market concentration and power. It seeks to prohibit dominant firms from operating across multiple lines of protein and mandates the breakup or divestiture of certain large entities. The bill specifically targets the beef market to reduce concentration and addresses the influence of foreign-controlled meatpacking enterprises. Additionally, it establishes protections for independent cattle producers against vertical consolidation practices. Through these measures, the Act intends to lower meat prices for American families and support the growth of independent processors.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +8
Would farmers be better off under this?
The bill protects independent cattle producers from coercive practices and aims to increase their share of the consumer dollar.
- Scored +7
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill provides financial assistance, loan guarantees, and technical assistance to farmers' cooperatives and small businesses through the SBA.
- Scored +6
Would business owners be better off under this?
Small business concerns and independent processors receive financial and technical support to compete.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reduced Meat Prices for Consumers: The bill aims to help bring down prices for families by restoring competition and reducing the market power of dominant firms (Section 2(b)(9); Section 401(1)).
-
Support for Independent Producers and Processors: The Act intends to promote the growth and viability of independent and regional meat processors (Section 2(b)(8)) and protect independent cattle producers from coercive or discriminatory practices (Section 2(b)(6)).
-
Economic Benefits for Farmers: By restructuring the industry, the bill aims to ensure that increased revenue flows more effectively to farmers and ranchers (Section 2(a)(8)).
-
Improved Working Conditions: The Act seeks to ensure that industry restructuring results in safer, fairer, and more sustainable jobs for workers (Section 2(b)(7)).
-
Financial Assistance for Small Competitors: The Small Business Administration may provide financial assistance, loan guarantees, and technical assistance to farmers' cooperatives and small business concerns to help them acquire or expand meatpacking facilities (Section 501(b)).
-
Redress for Feedlot Owners: Under the vertical consolidation prohibitions, feedlot owners may bring civil actions to recover damages if a covered meatpacking enterprise violates the 10 percent slaughter limit (Section 203(c)(1)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Mandatory Divestitures and Business Breakups: Large meatpacking enterprises may be required to sell off assets, undergo spin-offs, or undergo structural separation to comply with the law (Section 102(a)(1); Section 202(a)).
-
Prohibition on Operations for Foreign-Controlled Entities: It will be unlawful for covered foreign-controlled meatpacking enterprises to operate in interstate commerce in the United States, requiring them to divest their operations (Section 302(a)).
-
Restrictions on Business Expansion: Covered meatpacking enterprises are prohibited from acquiring assets or operations in a line of protein other than the one they currently engage in (Section 101(a)(2)).
-
Limits on Slaughter Volume: In the beef line of protein, a covered meatpacking enterprise is prohibited from slaughtering more than 10 percent of the cattle produced by any single covered feedlot in a calendar year (Section 203(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill protects independent cattle producers from coercive practices and aims to increase their share of the consumer dollar. Would business owners be better off under this? — Small business concerns and independent processors receive financial and technical support to compete. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill aims to improve the economic viability of rural communities by promoting regional meat processors. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — By lowering meat prices, the bill provides economic relief to low-income households facing food cost increases. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill aims to lower costs for American families through increased market competition.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill provides financial assistance, loan guarantees, and technical assistance to farmers' cooperatives and small businesses through the SBA. Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The act seeks to ensure restructuring results in safer, fairer, and more sustainable jobs for workers. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill promotes the growth of independent and regional meat processors to increase competition.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Commission to conduct studies and submit detailed reports to Congress regarding market structures.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill aims to lower food prices for families which can help reduce financial strain on low-income households.
- 3/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S883-887)
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts