Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act
A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act aims to amend the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act. It adjusts the boundary of the Conservation Area by updating the official map and increasing the total acreage. The bill also grants the Southern Nevada Water Authority rights-of-way for water pipeline infrastructure, powerlines, facilities, and access roads. These rights-of-way are intended for geotechnical investigations and the construction and operation of water transmission facilities. Additionally, the Act addresses the preservation of existing transmission and utility corridors.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill expands the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area by over 9,000 acres to protect land.
- Scored +3
Would people in cities be better off under this?
The bill facilitates water infrastructure development through the Southern Nevada Water Authority.
- Scored +2
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The bill secures water transmission capabilities which are vital for regional water security.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Conservation Area Size: The bill increases the acreage of the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area from 48,438 to 57,728 acres (Section 3(a)(2)).
-
Water Infrastructure Development: The Southern Nevada Water Authority is granted rights-of-way to construct and operate water transmission and related facilities, as well as perform geotechnical investigations (Section 3(b)(1)).
-
Resource Management Efficiency: The Authority is permitted to excavate and use or dispose of sand, gravel, minerals, or other materials resulting from pipeline tunneling to fulfill the purpose of the rights-of-way (Section 3(b)(2)(A)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential Impact on Surface Resources: The bill notes that construction of the water pipeline must not "permanently adversely affect" conservation area surface resources, implying a potential risk to these resources during the process (Section 3(b)(3)(B)).
-
Land Use Limitations: The Secretary is authorized to include reasonable terms and conditions to protect Conservation Area resources, which could affect how the rights-of-way are utilized (Section 3(b)(3)(A)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill expands the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area by over 9,000 acres to protect land. Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — The bill authorizes rights-of-way for water transmission infrastructure and related access roads.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill facilitates water infrastructure development through the Southern Nevada Water Authority. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill secures water transmission capabilities which are vital for regional water security.
- 2/4/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.