Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)

Combatting Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act of 2025

S. 1273 · Senate bill Crime and Law Enforcement

A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the ``Combatting Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act of 2025'', aims to strengthen the United States Secret Service. It focuses on increasing authority to investigate crimes involving digital asset transactions and transnational cyber criminal activity. The legislation targets unlicensed money transmitting businesses, structured transactions, and fraud against financial institutions. It also modifies existing laws regarding FinCEN exchanges and international financial institutions. Finally, it mandates a study by the Government Accountability Office to evaluate law enforcement's ability to deter money laundering in cyber crimes.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Scored +5

    Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?

    The bill enhances the Secret Service's ability to combat transnational cybercrime and digital asset fraud.

  • Scored +3

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill expands the investigative authority of a federal agency, the United States Secret Service.

  • Scored +2

    Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?

    The expansion of investigative authority may increase domestic surveillance capabilities related to digital transactions.

The opposite

  • Scored -1

    Does this protect people from being watched or searched?

    Expanded investigative powers may potentially reduce individual privacy regarding financial transactions.