Stephen Lynch (D-MA)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the designation of the "Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts" constitutes a violation of Federal law, and for other purposes.
A Democratic resolution with 10 Democratic cosponsors · See all 10 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the redesignation of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. The House contends that naming the building the "Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts" violates Federal law. The text notes that Congress previously intended for the center to be the sole national memorial to President Kennedy in Washington, D.C. The resolution calls for the immediate restoration of the original signage. Furthermore, it requests that all board members appointed by President Trump resign their positions.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The resolution seeks to restore the original intent of Congress and address unilateral changes to federal institutions.
- Scored +2
Would children be better off under this?
Restoring arts and humanities funding supports educational institutions and programming for students.
- Scored +2
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The text notes that restored funding supports programming for seniors.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this make housing cost less?
The resolution addresses funding for arts and humanities which indirectly supports community infrastructure but does not directly impact housing affordability.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Restoration of Original Signage: Restoring the original name of the center would align with the express intent of Congress to honor President John F. Kennedy as the sole national memorial in the area. (Resolution Section 1 and 2)
-
Preservation of Arts Funding: Reversing actions that terminated or canceled congressionally appropriated grants could restore funding to State and local art agencies, educational institutions, community theaters, and other organizations. (Whereas clauses regarding NEA and NEH grants)
-
Support for Community Programming: Maintaining Federal funding through the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Institute of Museum and Library Services could allow institutions to continue critical facility improvements and public programming for students, rural communities, individuals with disabilities, seniors, and veterans. (Whereas clauses regarding grant cancellations and museums)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Educational and Cultural Resources: The cancellation of over 500 NEA grants and 1,400 NEH grants terminates funding for State humanities councils, schools, libraries, and nonprofit organizations that provide teacher training, historical lectures, adult education, book festivals, and art exhibitions. (Whereas clauses regarding NEA and NEH grants)
-
Disruption of Museum Operations: Due to canceled Federal Government grants or contracts, many American museums have been forced to cancel critical facility improvements and public programming for various groups, including students, rural communities, individuals with disabilities, seniors, and veterans. (Whereas clause regarding American Alliance for Museums)
-
Impact of Staffing Cuts: Mass layoffs and sweeping staffing cuts at Federal arts and education agencies undermine the critical missions of those agencies. (Whereas clauses regarding staffing cuts and National Endowment for the Humanities)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Restoring arts and humanities funding supports educational institutions and programming for students. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The text indicates that federal grants support public programming for individuals with disabilities. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Restoring grants would support critical facility improvements and programming for rural communities. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The text notes that restored funding supports programming for seniors. Would students be better off under this? — Restoring federal grants supports educational institutions and student-focused programming. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The resolution highlights that federal grants support critical programming for veterans. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Restored funding for public programming can benefit low-income community members through accessible cultural institutions.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution seeks to restore the original intent of Congress and address unilateral changes to federal institutions.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Restoring federal grants could help rural communities maintain public programming and facility improvements as noted in the text.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make college cost less? — The bill aims to restore funding for educational institutions that rely on federal grants.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — The resolution addresses funding for arts and humanities which indirectly supports community infrastructure but does not directly impact housing affordability.
- 2/2/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
- 1/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/6/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 12/30/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Richard NealDemocrat · Massachusetts
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Frank PalloneDemocrat · New Jersey
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi