A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Ms. Clarke (NY) notified the House of her intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution calls for the censure of Representative Cory Mills. The document cites several allegations, including a domestic violence assault investigation in Washington, DC, and threats made against a former romantic partner in Florida. It also highlights a judicial injunction regarding dating violence and potential financial disclosure issues. Additionally, the text notes disputes regarding the veracity of Representative Mills' claims concerning a Bronze Star earned during his military service. If passed, the resolution requires the Representative to present himself in the well of the House for a public pronouncement of censure by the Speaker. Finally, the resolution mandates his removal from the Committee on Armed Services.
Yes
- Scored +6
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The resolution addresses potential misrepresentations in financial disclosures and military records, promoting integrity.
- Scored +5
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution highlights and acts upon allegations of domestic and dating violence against women.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
The resolution addresses allegations of domestic violence and dating violence against women.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The removal of a member from the Committee on Armed Services may reduce the committee's effectiveness in addressing veteran-related issues.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Accountability for Conduct: The resolution seeks to censure Representative Mills for conduct that reflects discredit upon the House of Representatives, specifically citing an alleged assault and a legal injunction for dating violence. (Whereas clauses regarding the February 19, 2025, incident and the October 14, 2025, Final Judgment of Injunction).
-
Financial Transparency: The text notes that the Office of Congressional Conduct found substantial reason to believe Representative Mills may have misrepresented financial disclosures or accepted unlawful contributions. (Whereas clause regarding the August 2024 report).
-
Honesty in Military Records: The resolution addresses disputes from individuals who claim the accounts used to recommend Representative Mills for a Bronze Star were fabricated or inaccurate. (Whereas clauses regarding the Bronze Star recommendation and statements from former service members).
-
Removal from Committee: The resolution includes the removal of the Representative from the Committee on Armed Services. (Resolution section 4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Committee Position: The resolution results in Representative Cory Mills being removed from the Committee on Armed Services. (Resolution section 4).
-
Public Reprimand: The resolution requires the Representative to stand in the well of the House of Representatives to have the censure read publicly by the Speaker. (Resolution sections 2 and 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution addresses potential misrepresentations in financial disclosures and military records, promoting integrity.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The resolution highlights and acts upon allegations of domestic and dating violence against women.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The removal of a member from the Committee on Armed Services may reduce the committee's effectiveness in addressing veteran-related issues.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The resolution addresses allegations of domestic violence and dating violence against women.
- 11/18/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
- NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Ms. Clarke (NY) notified the House of her intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.