Carlos Gimenez (R-FL)
Removing a certain Member from a certain standing committee of the House of Representatives.
A Republican resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution seeks to remove Representative Ramirez from her assignment to the Committee on Homeland Security. The resolution cites a statement made by Representative Ramirez at an event in Mexico City where she said, ``I am a proud Guatemalan before I am an American''. According to the text, this conduct is presented as a reason for her removal from the committee. The resolution also references House Rule XXIII, which requires members to behave in a manner that reflects creditably on the House.
Yes
- Scored +1
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The resolution enforces House Rule XXIII regarding the conduct of members to maintain the perceived integrity of House institutions.
- Scored +1
Does this tighten control of the border?
The removal of a member perceived as having conflicting allegiances may be intended to tighten the focus of the Homeland Security Committee on national border interests.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
The removal of a high-profile Guatemalan-American representative may be seen as a negative impact on Hispanic political representation.
- Scored -3
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The removal of a member who expresses strong ethnic identity may negatively impact the perceived political standing of immigrant-descended lawmakers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Committee Composition: The resolution aims to remove Mrs. Ramirez from the Committee on Homeland Security (Resolution text).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Loss of Committee Assignment: The resolution would result in the removal of Mrs. Ramirez from her position on the Committee on Homeland Security (Resolution text).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The removal of a high-profile Guatemalan-American representative may be seen as a negative impact on Hispanic political representation. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The removal of a member who expresses strong ethnic identity may negatively impact the perceived political standing of immigrant-descended lawmakers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution enforces House Rule XXIII regarding the conduct of members to maintain the perceived integrity of House institutions.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — The removal of a member perceived as having conflicting allegiances may be intended to tighten the focus of the Homeland Security Committee on national border interests.
- 8/8/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina