Nydia Velázquez (D-NY)
Recognizing July 28, 2025, as "World Hepatitis Day".
A Democratic resolution with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes July 28, 2025, as World Hepatitis Day. It highlights the global and domestic health problems caused by hepatitis B and hepatitis C. The text outlines the impact of these viruses, including infection rates, deaths, and affected populations. It notes that hepatitis B is preventable with a vaccine and hepatitis C is curable through antiviral treatment. Finally, the resolution expresses support for broad access to treatments, public awareness, and a robust governmental response to eliminate new infections.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +5
Would Asian Americans be better off under this?
The resolution targets hepatitis B, which disproportionately affects Asian Americans.
- Scored +5
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The resolution supports broad access to hepatitis B and C vaccinations and treatments.
- Scored +4
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Improved access to vaccination and treatment can reduce the heavy health and financial burdens of chronic hepatitis.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Access to Care: The resolution states that the House of Representatives supports broad access to hepatitis B and hepatitis C vaccination and treatments, which can help people get the medical care they need. This is found in the resolved section under paragraph (2).
-
Public Awareness: The text supports raising awareness of the risks and consequences of undiagnosed chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections, helping inform patients about new treatments. This is found in the resolved section under paragraph (3) and the goals section under paragraph (3).
-
Public Health Response: The measure calls for a robust governmental and public health response to protect the health of the approximately 5,900,000 people in the United States infected with hepatitis B or C. This is found in the resolved section under paragraph (4).
-
Infection Elimination Strategies: The resolution urges the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to partner with State and local health departments to develop strategies to increase adult vaccination and hepatitis C treatment to eliminate new infections. This is found in the resolved section under paragraph (5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The resolution targets hepatitis B, which disproportionately affects Asian Americans. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution addresses the higher rates of chronic viral hepatitis found among African Americans through better access to care. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The resolution addresses the higher rates of chronic viral hepatitis found among Hispanic Americans through better access to care. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Improved access to vaccination and treatment can reduce the heavy health and financial burdens of chronic hepatitis. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution targets the higher rates of chronic viral hepatitis found among Native Americans. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The resolution supports universal vaccination standards for adults aged 19 to 59. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Increased access to medical services can improve health outcomes for those living with chronic conditions.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution supports broad access to hepatitis B and C vaccinations and treatments. Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak? — The resolution urges the CDC to partner with local health departments to increase vaccination and treatment rates for hepatitis.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution aims to reduce viral hepatitis-related disparities and health inequities that disproportionately affect specific racial groups. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By improving health outcomes and increasing length of life, the resolution aims to mitigate the health burdens often associated with socioeconomic disparities.
- 8/1/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia