Troy Carter (D-LA)
Supporting the designation of the week of June 9 through June 15, 2025, as "National Men's Health Week".
A Democratic resolution with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution supports designating the week of June 9 through June 15, 2025, as National Men's Health Week. It highlights significant health disparities, such as men living an average of more than 5 years less than women and facing higher death rates from heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and unintentional injuries. The text notes that men are less likely to visit a doctor for regular screenings due to reasons like fear, embarrassment, and lack of insurance. It points out that early detection and screening tools can successfully treat many male-related health problems. Finally, the House of Representatives resolves to support this week of awareness and requests that the President issue a proclamation calling on the public to observe it.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +5
Would men be better off under this?
The entire resolution is dedicated to improving the health awareness and outcomes of men and boys.
- Scored +4
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The bill specifically addresses the higher incidence of prostate cancer and lower life expectancy among African-American men.
- Scored +4
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill highlights the lower life expectancy faced by American Indian/Alaska Native men.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for National Men's Health Week: Under the main resolved section, the House of Representatives supports designating the week of June 9 through June 15, 2025, as National Men's Health Week. This is positive because it encourages men and their families to engage in appropriate health behaviors and promotes health awareness events.
-
Call for Presidential Proclamation: Also under the main resolved section, the resolution requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States and interested groups to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities. This could benefit individuals by drawing national attention to preventable health problems and encouraging early detection and treatment.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: There are no sections or provisions within the bill that identify or create negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would men be better off under this? — The entire resolution is dedicated to improving the health awareness and outcomes of men and boys. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill specifically addresses the higher incidence of prostate cancer and lower life expectancy among African-American men. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill highlights the lower life expectancy faced by American Indian/Alaska Native men. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill notes higher prevalence of chronic diseases among Hispanic men. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — The bill highlights health risks like prostate and colorectal cancer relevant to middle-aged men. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill addresses health concerns like heart disease and cancer that impact older populations. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill notes specific risks for men in the 15-34 age group, such as testicular cancer. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — By increasing health awareness, it may help those who face barriers like high out-of-pocket costs.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — By promoting early detection and screening, the resolution aims to improve health outcomes for men. Does this make mental health care easier to get? — The resolution notes suicide as a top cause of death for men and aims to increase awareness of health risks.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The text highlights the specific health disparities and lower life expectancy faced by African-American and Native American men.
- 6/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Robert MenendezDemocrat · New Jersey