Jared Golden (D-ME)
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2550) to nullify the Executive order relating to Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs, and for other purposes.
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Adopted by the House 232–194
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution directs the House of Representatives to proceed with the consideration of H.R. 2550. The purpose of H.R. 2550 is to nullify an Executive order regarding Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs. The resolution waives all points of order against the consideration of the bill. It also establishes specific rules for debate, allowing one hour of discussion. Finally, it instructs the Clerk to transmit a message to the Senate following the bill's passage.
Yes
- Scored +5
Would union members be better off under this?
By nullifying exclusions from labor-management relations, the bill enhances the rights and presence of union workers.
- Scored +5
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?
The bill seeks to nullify exclusions from labor-management relations programs, which generally strengthens union access and rights.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
2 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. One of them decided something; the rest moved it along.
- The House: the vote on whether to adopt the resolution A resolution is one chamber speaking for itself — setting its own rules, taking a position, honouring someone — and it never goes to the President. Agreeing to it is the whole decision. Passed 232 yes · 194 no
12/11/2025 · Roll call 331 · recorded as “On Agreeing to the Resolution”
- The House: a vote to take a measure away from a committee that has not acted on it A committee can hold a measure indefinitely. This asks the whole chamber to take it away from the committee and bring it to the floor. If it fails, the measure stays where it was. Motion to discharge agreed to 222 yes · 200 no
12/10/2025 · Roll call 321 · recorded as “On Motion to Discharge”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of Executive Order: The bill aims to nullify the Executive order relating to Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs (H.R. 2550). This could be considered positive for those who believe the current exclusions from labor-management relations programs should be removed.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are mentioned: The provided text does not contain details regarding the specific contents of H.R. 2550 or the potential negative consequences that would result from nullifying the Executive order.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — By nullifying exclusions from labor-management relations, the bill enhances the rights and presence of union workers.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The bill seeks to nullify exclusions from labor-management relations programs, which generally strengthens union access and rights.
- 12/11/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 232 - 194 (Roll no. 331).
- On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 232 - 194 (Roll no. 331).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5794-5795)
- 12/10/2025
- Mr. Golden (ME) moved to discharge.
- On motion to discharge Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - 200 (Roll no. 321).
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 432, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Guthrie demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- The previous question was ordered without objection.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 432.
- Considered from the Discharge Calendar. (consideration: CR H5520-5522; text: CR H5521)
- Consideration initiated from the Discharge Calendar.
- DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule, the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Golden (ME) motion to discharge.
- MOTION TO DISCHARGE COMMITTEE - Pursuant to clause 2 of Rule XV, Mr. Golden (ME) called up motion No. 3, to discharge the Committee on Rules from further consideration of H. Res. 432.
- 12/9/2025
- NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER MOTION TO DISCHARGE - Mr. Golden (ME) notified the House of his intent to offer a motion to discharge the Committee on Rules from further consideration of H.Res. 432 pursuant to clause 2(c) of rule XV. The Chair announced that the House will entertain the gentleman's motion within two legislative days.
- 11/17/2025
- Motion to discharge the Committee on Rules filed by Mr. Golden (ME). Assigned to the Discharge Calendar, Calendar No. 3. (consideration: CR H4702)
- 6/4/2025
- Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Mr. Golden (ME). Petition No: 119-6. (<a href="https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2025060406">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
- 5/20/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.