Michael Baumgartner (R-WA)
Condemning Iran's failure to comply with its international nuclear obligations.
A Republican resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2005)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 398 condemns Iran for failing to follow international nuclear obligations and for not cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The resolution expresses concern over Iran's production of enriched uranium and its potential to produce nuclear weapons. It calls for the United States to use diplomatic and economic measures, alongside allies, to hold Iran accountable. It also urges Iran to provide IAEA inspectors with full access to nuclear sites. Finally, it asserts that Congress should take steps to authorize the use of U.S. Armed Forces if international efforts fail or if Iran crosses the nuclear threshold.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +6
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?
The resolution emphasizes coordination with international allies, specifically the E3, to address nuclear proliferation.
- Scored +5
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?
It calls for the use of all necessary diplomatic measures to resolve the nuclear threat.
- Scored +3
Does this give the federal government more power?
The resolution asserts the role of Congress in authorizing the use of military force.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?
The bill suggests the potential authorization of U.S. Armed Forces, which would increase military spending.
- Scored -2
Does this make trade with other countries easier?
The call for 'economic measures' likely implies sanctions which can disrupt international trade.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Regional Stability: The resolution aims to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, which it states would otherwise undermine regional stability and increase the risk of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.
-
International Accountability: By calling for "all necessary diplomatic and economic measures" and supporting the IAEA's verification efforts, the resolution seeks to ensure Iran adheres to international norms and its NPT-related obligations.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Potential for Military Conflict: The resolution asserts that Congress should take steps to "authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces against the Islamic Republic of Iran" if certain conditions are met, such as if Iran withdraws from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons or crosses the nuclear threshold.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The resolution emphasizes coordination with international allies, specifically the E3, to address nuclear proliferation. Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — It calls for the use of all necessary diplomatic measures to resolve the nuclear threat. Does this put more money into stopping terrorism? — The bill reinforces the designation of Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism and seeks to hold it accountable. Does this reduce what is spent on the military? — The bill suggests the potential authorization of U.S. Armed Forces, which would increase military spending. Does this make trade with other countries easier? — The call for 'economic measures' likely implies sanctions which can disrupt international trade.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution asserts the role of Congress in authorizing the use of military force.
- 5/14/2025
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2005)
- 5/8/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.