Bryan Steil (R-WI)
Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of Representative from the Fourteenth Congressional District of Florida.
A Republican resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Adopted by the House unanimous consent
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
The House by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no member's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution addresses an election contest filed on November 17, 2024. The contest relates to the office of Representative from the Fourteenth Congressional District of Florida. The House of Representatives has resolved to dismiss the contest. This decision is based on the grounds that the House lacks jurisdiction over a primary election, caucus, or political party convention. Under the Federal Contested Election Act, jurisdiction is limited to official general and special elections.
Yes
- Scored +2
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The dismissal of the contest leaves the control of the primary election process to the state and the political party.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The resolution asserts that the House lacks jurisdiction over primary elections, effectively limiting federal intervention in state-level party processes.
- Scored -2
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The dismissal denies a legal review of the specific allegations presented in the election contest.
- Scored -1
Does this make elections run better?
While providing jurisdictional clarity, the dismissal prevents the House from reviewing the specific claims of the election contest.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Jurisdictional Clarity: By citing section 2(1) of the Federal Contested Election Act, the resolution clarifies that the House of Representatives has jurisdiction over official general and special elections, but not over primary elections, caucuses, or political party conventions.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Dismissal of Election Contest: The election contest filed on November 17, 2024, regarding the Fourteenth Congressional District of Florida is dismissed, which means the specific claims in that contest will not be addressed by the House of Representatives.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The dismissal of the contest leaves the control of the primary election process to the state and the political party. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The dismissal denies a legal review of the specific allegations presented in the election contest. Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution asserts that the House lacks jurisdiction over primary elections, effectively limiting federal intervention in state-level party processes. Does this make elections run better? — While providing jurisdictional clarity, the dismissal prevents the House from reviewing the specific claims of the election contest.
- 12/9/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H5102)
- On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H5102)
- Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H5102)
- Mr. Steil asked unanimous consent to consider as introduced.
- 4/9/2025
- The House Committee on House Administration reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-51, by Mr. Steil.
- Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 16.
- Bill introduced.