Daniel Meuser (R-PA)

Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives.

H.Res. 213 · House resolution Congress

A Republican resolution with no cosponsors

Last activity — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Adopted

The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.

Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Adopted by the House unanimous consent

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

The House by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no member's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This resolution serves to elect specific Members to a standing committee of the House of Representatives. The resolution names several individuals to serve on the Committee on Ethics. The document was presented in the House of Representatives on March 11, 2025.

Yes

  • Scored +1

    Does this make elections run better?

    The appointment of members to the Ethics Committee facilitates the oversight of congressional conduct.

  • Scored +1

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    Establishing an ethics committee structure supports institutional transparency and accountability.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.