Bryan Steil (R-WI)· Mar 24, 2025
H.Amdt. 9: Its purpose is not yet published.
Adopted
With no one objecting, no names recorded
Bryan Steil (R-WI)
A Republican resolution with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
The House by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no member's position on it was recorded.
This resolution establishes the spending limits for various House of Representatives committees during the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. It sets maximum amounts for committee expenses, including staff salaries, for the entire congress. The resolution further divides these funds into specific limits for the first and second sessions of the congress. It also creates a reserve fund to cover unanticipated committee expenses. Finally, it outlines the rules for payments, regulations, and the authority of the Committee on House Administration to make adjustments.
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
The resolution implements budgetary caps and a controlled reserve fund to manage legislative expenses.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill imposes strict maximum spending limits on all designated House committees for the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires committee expenses to be authorized via vouchers signed by committee chairs and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
Would business owners be better off under this?
The cap on the Committee on Small Business may limit the resources available for legislative support of small businesses.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
By capping the budget of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, it limits the potential scale of veteran-related legislative activity.
Financial Oversight and Limits: The resolution places strict caps on how much each committee can spend, which includes limits for the first session and second session of the congress (Section 1, Section 2, and Section 3).
Contingency Planning: A reserve fund of $4,000,000 is established to handle unexpected costs that may arise during the congress (Section 6).
Strict Spending Caps: Each committee is restricted to a specific amount of money for its expenses and staff salaries, which could limit their operations to the exact amounts listed in Section 1, Section 2, and Section 3.
Potential Budget Reductions: The Committee on House Administration has the authority to adjust the amounts provided in Section 1 to comply with presidential orders or changes in appropriations (Section 7).
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
Bryan Steil (R-WI)· Mar 24, 2025
Adopted
With no one objecting, no names recorded
Democrat · New York