Grace Meng (D-NY)
Recognizing that the United States needs to support and strengthen mothers in the workforce by investing in the Mom Economy.
A Democratic resolution with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 1582 recognizes the need for the United States to support and strengthen mothers in the workforce by investing in what it calls the Mom Economy. The resolution highlights the economic contributions of mothers alongside the systemic hurdles they face, such as lower labor participation rates, wage gaps, and high childcare costs. It outlines the sense of the House of Representatives that the country should prioritize investments in caregiving infrastructure and social safety net programs. Specific recommendations include providing robust paid family and medical leave, universal childcare, and permanent expansions of child tax credits. Ultimately, the measure urges policymakers to focus on working mothers in future economic and social policy decisions.
Yes· 3 of 35
- Scored +10
Would women be better off under this?
The entire resolution is focused on supporting and strengthening mothers in the workforce by closing gender wage gaps, providing paid leave, and ensuring workplace protections.
- Scored +9
Would children be better off under this?
The resolution emphasizes investments in child tax credits, nutrition programs, and Head Start to combat child hunger and reduce child poverty.
- Scored +9
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The resolution targets poverty reduction through SNAP benefit enhancements, child tax credit expansions, and minimum wage increases.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Paid Family and Medical Leave: Under section (4)(A)(i)(I), the resolution calls for robust paid family and medical leave plans for all workers. This is positive because it provides paid parental leave regardless of gender and allows leave for family caregiving and medical needs, which can help keep parents from leaving the workforce.
-
Childcare and Early Learning Investments: Under section (4)(A)(i)(II)(aa)-(cc), the text proposes investing in the childcare industry with the goal of universal childcare, increasing funding for Head Start and Early Head Start, and paying childcare workers a living wage. This could help make childcare more affordable and accessible for families while supporting workers.
-
Nutrition Program Enhancements: Under section (4)(A)(i)(II)(II)(aa)-(bb), the resolution supports boosting SNAP benefits, removing time restrictions and work requirements for SNAP, and increasing funds for school meals. This benefits people by increasing access to nutritious food and helping to combat child hunger.
-
Poverty Reduction and Tax Credits: Under section (4)(A)(i)(II)(III)(aa)-(bb), the measure calls for a permanent expansion of the child tax credit and improvements to the earned income tax credit. These steps are designed to improve income security, infant and maternal health, and lift children and families out of poverty.
-
Wage Increases and Discrimination Protections: Under section (4)(A)(i)(II)(II)(V) and section (4)(A)(B)(i)-(ii), the bill recommends raising the Federal minimum wage for all workers, ensuring workplace protections for LGBTQ+ mothers through the Equality Act, and reducing wage discrimination through the Paycheck Fairness Act. These points benefit workers by aiming to increase pay and protect against discrimination.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Absence of Negative Provisions: Based strictly on the text provided, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that impose negative consequences, burdens, or penalties on individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The entire resolution is focused on supporting and strengthening mothers in the workforce by closing gender wage gaps, providing paid leave, and ensuring workplace protections. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution specifically addresses the higher poverty rates and wage gaps faced by Black mothers and calls for targeted economic interventions. Would children be better off under this? — The resolution emphasizes investments in child tax credits, nutrition programs, and Head Start to combat child hunger and reduce child poverty. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The resolution addresses economic disparities faced by Latinas and advocates for policies to improve their financial stability. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The resolution targets poverty reduction through SNAP benefit enhancements, child tax credit expansions, and minimum wage increases. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution highlights the specific wage gaps and poverty rates experienced by Native women and prioritizes their support. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The resolution recognizes the unique economic roles and challenges faced by AAPI mothers in the workforce. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly recommends ensuring workplace protections for LGBTQ+ individuals through support for the Equality Act. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — The resolution benefits working-age adults by promoting paid family and medical leave and workplace protections. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The resolution supports middle-class households by addressing high childcare costs and providing paid family leave. Would workers who earn tips be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly calls for raising the Federal minimum wage for all workers, including tipped workers. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The resolution supports young working parents by advocating for paid family leave, affordable childcare, and higher wages. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The resolution notes that mothers often care for family members with disabilities and advocates for family caregiving leave and social safety net improvements. Would men be better off under this? — The resolution advocates for paid parental leave provided in equal amounts for all parents regardless of gender, benefiting fathers as well. Would union members be better off under this? — The resolution supports labor standards by advocating for higher minimum wages and robust worker protections. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The broader economic proposals, such as paid leave and childcare investments, benefit working families broadly across demographics. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The resolution notes that mothers often shoulder unpaid caregiving responsibilities for older relatives, making caregiving infrastructure beneficial for seniors.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make child care cost less? — The resolution calls for universal childcare, increased funding for Head Start, and financial support to guarantee affordable and high-quality childcare for all families. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The resolution is specifically dedicated to eliminating gender-based wage discrimination, supporting mothers in the workforce, and promoting gender equality through the Paycheck Fairness Act. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The resolution proposes permanent expansions of the child tax credit, improvements to the earned income tax credit, and enhancements to nutrition programs to lift families out of poverty. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The resolution explicitly recommends ensuring workplace protections for LGBTQ+ mothers through measures such as the Equality Act. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution highlights the wage gaps and higher poverty rates faced by mothers of color and calls for targeted economic policies to address these disparities.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay? — The resolution supports raising the Federal minimum wage for all workers, including tipped workers, and adjusting it yearly to keep pace with inflation. Is this likely to create jobs? — The resolution explicitly notes that significant investment in childcare and caregiving infrastructure is job creating and job enabling. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The resolution asserts that investing in the Mom Economy and keeping women in the workforce sustains a thriving and productive economy. Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The resolution recommends a permanent expansion of the child tax credit and improvements to the earned income tax credit, which lowers tax burdens for middle-class families. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — By supporting childcare and workforce stability, the resolution aims to reduce employee turnover and help businesses retain staff. Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The resolution promotes broader worker protections and fair wages that align with labor advocacy goals. Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — The resolution calls for policies to support working families and improve the caregiving infrastructure, which indirectly supports small business workforce stability.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The resolution calls for critical investments in maternal health care that ensure access to the full range of reproductive health care and family planning. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution advocates for expanded access to maternal health care and reproductive healthcare services. Does this put more money into Medicaid, the health coverage for people on low incomes? — The resolution recommends expanding access to reproductive health care and family planning programs. Does this put more money into medical research? — The resolution supports addressing the maternal mortality crisis through critical investments in maternal health. Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — The resolution emphasizes broader social safety net investments to improve community health outcomes.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — The resolution calls for increased funds for school meals and support for early learning programs like Head Start and Early Head Start.
- 9/24/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida