Al Green (D-TX)
Original Resolution Honoring the Life, Public Service, and Legacy of the Honorable Craig Anthony Washington
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This bill is a resolution in the House of Representatives honoring the life, public service, and legacy of the late Congressman Craig Anthony Washington. It details his upbringing in Texas, his education, and his career as a lawyer, civil rights advocate, and lawmaker in the Texas Legislature and United States Congress. The text highlights his specific policy efforts, including supporting civil rights legislation, opposing certain trade and military agreements, and advocating for criminal justice reform. Finally, the resolution formally states that the House of Representatives honors his contributions and expresses respect for his work.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +7
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The resolution details Washington's career-long advocacy for civil rights, racial justice, and fighting institutionalized racism.
- Scored +7
Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?
The resolution highlights his advocacy for alternative sentencing and opposition to punitive criminal justice measures.
- Scored +7
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The resolution honors a prominent Black legislator who championed civil rights and attended historically Black institutions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Recognition of Public Service: The primary provision of the bill in the final resolving clause honors the life, legacy, and public service of Congressman Craig Anthony Washington. This positively acknowledges a historical figure who fought for civil rights and criminal justice reform.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- None Identified: The provided text does not contain any sections or provisions that impose burdens, penalties, or negative consequences on individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this shorten or soften prison sentences? — The resolution highlights his advocacy for alternative sentencing and opposition to punitive criminal justice measures. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution details Washington's career-long advocacy for civil rights, racial justice, and fighting institutionalized racism. Does this change how police departments operate? — Washington introduced legislation promoting community policing and crime prevention initiatives. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The text mentions Washington's efforts to increase the participation of women in State government. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Washington advocated for resources to be directed toward social services to help the community.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution honors a prominent Black legislator who championed civil rights and attended historically Black institutions. Would children be better off under this? — Washington supported the Family Unity Demonstration Project to keep incarcerated parents connected to their children. Would women be better off under this? — Washington worked to increase the participation of women in State government. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Washington's advocacy for social services and crime prevention aims to support disadvantaged communities. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Washington's legislative focus included community policing and local social services in Houston and Texas.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — Washington advocated for directing resources toward education.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The text notes Washington's support for the Civil Rights Act of 1991 which strengthened protections against employment discrimination.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution highlights Washington's dedication to representative government of and for the people.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this reduce what is spent on the military? — Washington opposed the authorization for the use of military force in the Persian Gulf.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — The resolution highlights Washington's advocacy for healthcare and social services.
- 7/27/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.