Jeff Crank (R-CO)
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members of the House from entering inappropriate relationships with House employees.
A Republican resolution with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution proposes changes to the Rules of the House of Representatives regarding personal relationships. It seeks to amend rule XXIII to prohibit Members, Delegates, or Resident Commissioners from engaging in sexual relationships with House employees. An exception is made for spouses, and the Committee on Ethics may grant exemptions under specific conditions. These conditions require that the employee does not work under the Member's supervision and is not an employee of a committee the Member serves on. The resolution also directs the Committee on Ethics to create specific regulations and procedures for these exemptions.
Yes
- Scored +4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires the Committee on Ethics to establish regulations for the confidential disclosure and review of personal relationships involving House members.
- Scored +3
Would women be better off under this?
The restriction on sexual relationships between superiors and employees provides additional structural protections against workplace misconduct often disproportionately affecting women.
- Scored +3
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
By prohibiting sexual relationships between members of power and subordinates, the bill helps mitigate potential sexual harassment and gender-based power imbalances in the workplace.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Accountability for Officials: The resolution amends rule XXIII to prohibit Members, Delegates, or Resident Commissioners from engaging in sexual relationships with House employees, which creates a clear standard of conduct (Rule XXIII, paragraph (a)).
-
Established Oversight Procedures: The Committee on Ethics would be required to issue regulations within 60 days to establish procedures for the confidential submission and review of exemption requests (Rule XXIII, paragraph (d)(1)).
-
Conflict of Interest Protection: The new regulations would establish standards to determine if a relationship creates an actual or apparent conflict of interest or violates the Code of Official Conduct (Rule XXIII, paragraph (d)(2)(B)).
-
Integrity of the House: The Committee on Ethics would have the authority to take any action it deems necessary to protect the integrity of the House (Rule XXIII, paragraph (d)(2)(C)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly detailed in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Committee on Ethics to establish regulations for the confidential disclosure and review of personal relationships involving House members.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The restriction on sexual relationships between superiors and employees provides additional structural protections against workplace misconduct often disproportionately affecting women.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — By prohibiting sexual relationships between members of power and subordinates, the bill helps mitigate potential sexual harassment and gender-based power imbalances in the workplace.
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Kimberlyn King-HindsRepublican · Northern Mariana Islands