Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Senate's current cloture and filibuster rules are contrary to the constitutional design of two co-equal majoritarian legislative bodies, are non-deliberative in practice, disenfranchise Members of the House of Representatives and their constituents, and disrupt the proper balance of powers between the two chambers of Congress, and for other purposes.

Restoration of Majority Rule: The resolution suggests that reforming or abolishing filibuster rules would restore the principle of majority rule in Senate proceedings, ensuring that legislation supported by a majority of both chambers can become law (Section 2(b)(1)).

Increased Accountability: By ensuring that legislation passed by the House receives a timely floor vote in the Senate, the resolution aims to uphold the representative function of the House and the expectations of the voters who elect them (Section 1(e)(1), (3) and Section 2(b)(2)).

Meaningful Voting Weight: The resolution argues that removing the minority veto would prevent the "dilution" of the weight of a citizen's vote, as legislation passed by their elected representatives would no longer be rendered meaningless by a small fraction of the national population (Section 1(e)(4), (5), (6)).

Loss of Minority Protections: The resolution argues that the Senate was designed as a "deliberative check" and a "fence" against the passions of momentary majorities (Section 1(a)(5)). Removing current rules could potentially eliminate these protections against the "oppression" of a majority (Section 1(a)(4)).

Reduction in Senate Deliberation: The resolution suggests the Senate should move toward final dispositions determined by a majority of Senators present and voting (Section 2(b)(2)), which could change the current nature of how the Senate checks legislation passed by the House (Section 1(d)(3)).