Michael Lawler (R-NY)
Expressing support for the recognition of July 3 through July 10, 2026, as "National Extreme Heat Awareness Week", a national event educating the public on the dangers of extreme heat and the risks of extreme heat events to public safety, infrastructure, agriculture, and much more, and supporting the goals of a National Extreme Heat Awareness Week.
A Republican resolution with 11 Democratic cosponsors · See all 11 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 1361 expresses support for recognizing July 3 through July 10, 2026, as "National Extreme Heat Awareness Week." The resolution aims to educate the public on how extreme heat dangers affect public safety, infrastructure, and agriculture. It supports goals to increase knowledge and preparedness regarding extreme heat events. The House of Representatives encourages more resources for public awareness and invites citizens to observe the week through activities and ceremonies.
Yes· 3 of 33
- Scored +4
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Seniors are a highly vulnerable population during extreme heat events.
- Scored +4
Would farmers be better off under this?
Specifically identifies risks to agriculture and those who work outside.
- Scored +4
Would retired people be better off under this?
Retirees are often in high-risk age groups for heat-related illness.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Public Education: The resolution supports a national event to educate people on the dangers of extreme heat and risks to public safety, which could help prevent heat-related deaths.
-
Increased Preparedness: By promoting educational initiatives and community programming, the resolution aims to increase overall knowledge and preparedness for heat events.
-
Support for Preventative Measures: The text highlights the importance of public safety campaigns regarding heatstroke and heat exhaustion, as well as the implementation of new cooling technologies.
-
Focus on Vulnerable Groups: The resolution recognizes the life-threatening conditions faced by those who work outside, participate in outdoor activities, or lack refuge from the heat.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would farmers be better off under this? — Specifically identifies risks to agriculture and those who work outside. Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees are often in high-risk age groups for heat-related illness. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors are a highly vulnerable population during extreme heat events. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Targets those who lack refuge from the heat, who are often low-income individuals. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — People with disabilities can be more vulnerable to heat and benefit from increased awareness. Would union members be better off under this? — Protects outdoor laborers in trade, transportation, and utilities from heat injuries. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban heat island effects make urban residents more vulnerable to extreme heat. Would children be better off under this? — Increases awareness of heat dangers in schools and for vulnerable youth. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Provides safety information for outdoor workers and adults. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Benefits those in agricultural roles in rural areas. Would students be better off under this? — Encourages awareness activities in schools. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Provides education on heat safety for those engaged in outdoor activities. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all racial groups. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all racial groups. Would billionaires be better off under this? — General public safety education benefits all households. Would business owners be better off under this? — Reduced labor productivity loss due to heat awareness can benefit business owners. Would high-income households be better off under this? — General public safety education benefits all households. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — General public safety education benefits all households. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all racial groups. Would immigrants be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all residents. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all communities. Would men be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all genders. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — General public safety education benefits all households. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all racial groups. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — General public safety education benefits all households. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — General public health awareness benefits all citizens. Would white Americans be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all racial groups. Would women be better off under this? — General public health awareness benefits all genders.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Increases public awareness of heatstroke and heat exhaustion to prevent medical emergencies. Does this put more money into medical research? — The resolution recognizes the importance of continued research to address extreme heat.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster? — The bill suggests improving Federal response and the declaration of national extreme heat emergencies.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — Reducing heat-driven labor productivity losses can positively impact the economy.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Encourages improved Federal response and declarations of national emergencies.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/11/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Christian MenefeeDemocrat · Texas
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan