Pete Sessions (R-TX)
Expressing support of the goal of celebrating a "National Day of Honor and Respect" in conjunction with "Constitution Day and Citizenship Day".
A Republican resolution with 8 Democratic cosponsors · See all 14 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for celebrating a National Day of Honor and Respect'' together with Constitution Day and Citizenship Day''. It highlights the history of immigrants coming to the United States and mentions past national movements like the Abolitionist Movement and Civil Rights Movement. The text notes that Congress designated September 17 as ``Constitution Day and Citizenship Day'' in 1952. It also points out that July 4, 2026, marks the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Finally, the House of Representatives resolves to support this new day of honor, honor immigrant contributions, encourage positive citizen interactions, commit to reducing hate and discrimination, and affirm civic education.
Yes· 3 of 18
- Scored +3
Would immigrants be better off under this?
Explicitly honors the contributions of immigrants and celebrates diversity.
- Scored +2
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The resolution references key civil rights milestones and expresses a commitment to reducing racism.
- Scored +2
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
Honoring immigrant contributions and reducing xenophobia benefits Hispanic and other immigrant communities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Honor and Recognition: Under resolved section (2), the House honors the contributions of immigrants and Americans of diverse backgrounds, which publicly recognizes their role in the country.
-
Reducing Discrimination: Under resolved section (4), the text states that the House remains committed to reducing acts of hate, discrimination, racism, and xenophobia, which aims to foster a more inclusive environment for individuals.
-
Promoting Education and Service: Under resolved section (5), the House affirms the importance of promoting civic education and public service in communities throughout the Nation, which benefits people by encouraging community engagement.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — Explicitly honors the contributions of immigrants and celebrates diversity. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution references key civil rights milestones and expresses a commitment to reducing racism. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Recognizes diverse backgrounds and works to reduce xenophobia. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Honoring immigrant contributions and reducing xenophobia benefits Hispanic and other immigrant communities. Would students be better off under this? — Affirms the importance of promoting civic education in communities. Would women be better off under this? — Highlights the Women's Suffrage Movement as a defining national moment. Would children be better off under this? — Promoting civic education positively supports youth development. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Supports general anti-discrimination principles. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Fosters community cohesion and shared American identity. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Broadly honors diverse American backgrounds. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Promotes community interaction and inclusion. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Encourages public service and historical reflection. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Promotes community interaction and inclusion. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Encourages overall national unity and shared civic identity. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Encourages civic participation and unity among younger citizens.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The resolution expresses commitment to reducing discrimination and honoring diverse backgrounds, which fosters a more inclusive environment for marginalized groups. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — By explicitly committing to reducing racism and xenophobia, the resolution promotes a supportive cultural environment for racial minorities. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The resolution briefly references historical civil rights movements, aligning broadly with principles of equality.
- 10/13/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/9/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Clay FullerRepublican · Georgia
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York