Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL)
Condemning racist rhetoric targeting Indian and Chinese Americans, reaffirming that immigrants from all backgrounds are vital to the United States, and calling on all elected officials to refrain from language that promotes racial or ethnic division.
A Democratic resolution with 13 Democratic cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution condemns racist rhetoric specifically targeting Indian and Chinese Americans. It reaffirms that immigrants from all backgrounds are essential to the United States. The text addresses an alarming rise in anti-Asian hate and anti-South Asian rhetoric following the 2024 Presidential election. It specifically highlights derogatory posts shared by the President regarding immigrants from India and China. Finally, the resolution calls on all elected officials to stop using language that promotes ethnic or racial division.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +6
Would Asian Americans be better off under this?
The resolution specifically condemns the rise in anti-Asian hate and specific derogatory rhetoric directed at Indian and Chinese Americans.
- Scored +5
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The resolution explicitly affirms that immigrants from all backgrounds are vital to the nation's fabric.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The resolution condemns racist rhetoric and harmful stereotypes targeting Indian, Chinese, and other Asian American communities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Condemnation of hate: The resolution seeks to condemn the racist language propagated by the President against those of Indian and Chinese origin (Section 1).
-
Affirmation of immigrant contributions: It affirms that immigrants, including Indian and Chinese Americans, are vital to the fabric of the United States (Section 2).
-
Protection of community values: The resolution affirms that attacks based on national origin or ethnicity are un-American (Section 4).
-
Broad condemnation of hate: It condemns all forms of hate against various communities, including Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, in the strongest possible terms (Section 5).
-
Call for better conduct from officials: It calls on all elected officials, including the President, to refrain from using language that promotes racial or ethnic division or stereotypes (Section 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are listed within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The resolution specifically condemns the rise in anti-Asian hate and specific derogatory rhetoric directed at Indian and Chinese Americans. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly affirms that immigrants from all backgrounds are vital to the nation's fabric.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution condemns racist rhetoric and harmful stereotypes targeting Indian, Chinese, and other Asian American communities. Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — The resolution affirms the vital importance of immigrants to the United States, countering rhetoric that characterizes them as threats.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution calls on elected officials to refrain from using divisive or stereotypical language.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/22/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan