Al Green (D-TX)
Original Resolution Condemning the Hateful Comments of Texas Congressional Candidate Maureen Galindo
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution is titled the "Original Resolution Condemning the Hateful Comments of Texas Congressional Candidate Maureen Galindo." The House of Representatives aims to condemn comments made by Ms. Galindo on Instagram regarding Zionism and the use of the Karnes ICE Detention Center. The text finds that her comments advocate for the imprisonment of Americans based on their ideologies and associations. It further notes that such calls evoke historical horrors like the Holocaust and violate principles of liberty and justice. Ultimately, the House resolves to condemn these statements.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +1
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The resolution serves as a formal congressional record of condemnation regarding political rhetoric.
- Scored +1
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?
The resolution affirms that while speech is protected, individuals can still be condemned for hateful rhetoric.
- Scored +1
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The resolution opposes the use of detention centers as political punishment for associations.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this tighten control of the border?
The resolution criticizes the use of ICE detention centers as tools for political punishment.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Condemnation of Hate Speech: The resolution serves to officially condemn comments that advocate for the imprisonment and castration of Americans based on their ideologies or associations (Section 2). This provides a formal stance against speech that targets individuals based on identity or beliefs.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts for people are identified in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — The resolution affirms that while speech is protected, individuals can still be condemned for hateful rhetoric. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution serves as a formal congressional record of condemnation regarding political rhetoric.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — The resolution opposes the use of detention centers as political punishment for associations.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — The resolution distinguishes between protected free speech and the right of the government to condemn hate speech. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution condemns speech that targets individuals based on identity and religious persecution. Does this tighten control of the border? — The resolution criticizes the use of ICE detention centers as tools for political punishment.
- 5/21/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.