Diana DeGette (D-CO)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that over 25 years of real-world evidence and hundreds of peer-reviewed studies proving that mifepristone is safe and effective should be respected, and law and policy governing access to lifesaving, time-sensitive medication abortion care in the United States should be equitable, transparent, and based on the best available peer-reviewed evidence-based science.
A Democratic resolution with 54 Democratic cosponsors · See all 54 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the safety and efficacy of mifepristone. It asserts that the medication has a proven safety record backed by over 25 years of research and clinical trials. The resolution states that the FDA has previously approved modifications to make the medication more accessible through mail or pharmacies. It argues that current abortion bans and restrictions have created an access crisis in various states. Finally, it calls for FDA policies to be based on transparent scientific review rather than political interference.
Yes· 3 of 14
- Scored +8
Does this make abortion easier to get?
The resolution advocates for preserving and expanding access to medication abortion via telemedicine and mail-order.
- Scored +5
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The resolution highlights that maintaining abortion access helps mitigate reproductive health disparities affecting Black Americans.
- Scored +5
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The resolution states that preserving access is crucial for addressing health inequities faced by Indigenous people.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Access to Care: The resolution emphasizes that mifepristone is more accessible when dispensed by mail or at a pharmacy following telemedicine consultations (Resolution, Section 2021/2023 references).
-
Reduced Barriers for Vulnerable Groups: Preserving and expanding access to medication abortion is noted as important for ensuring equitable access for specific groups, including Black and Indigenous people, people of color, immigrants, people with lower incomes, people in rural communities, LGBTQ+ people, people living with disabilities, and people experiencing intimate partner violence (Resolution, Section 4).
-
Protection of Patient Safety through Science: The resolution advocates for FDA policies to be based on gold-standard medical evidence and transparent scientific review to ensure drug regulation is grounded in safety and efficacy (Resolution, Section 1).
-
Increased Willingness to Seek Care: The text notes that the privacy provided by telehealth consultations may increase a patient's willingness to disclose issues such as abuse or coercion (Resolution, Whereas clause regarding domestic violence).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Devastating Health Impacts from Reduced Access: The resolution states that the impact on the health and well-being of patients would be devastating if actions were taken to reduce patient access to medication abortion or increase barriers to prescribing and dispensing it (Resolution, Whereas clause).
-
Increased Travel and Wait Times: The text indicates that abortion bans and restrictions force patients to travel greater distances for care and face longer wait times (Resolution, Whereas clause).
-
Forced Pregnancy: Restrictions can force some patients who are unable to access care to remain pregnant against their will (Resolution, Whereas clause).
-
Increased Risk of Domestic Violence: The text mentions that scientific research has demonstrated that restricting access to abortion increases the risk of domestic violence for pregnant people (Resolution, Whereas clause).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution highlights that maintaining abortion access helps mitigate reproductive health disparities affecting Black Americans. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution states that preserving access is crucial for addressing health inequities faced by Indigenous people. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The resolution emphasizes that maintaining telemedicine and mail-order options is crucial for those in rural communities. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The resolution includes immigrants as a group that would benefit from equitable medication abortion access. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The text identifies LGBTQ+ people as a group that suffers disproportionately from reproductive health disparities. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The text asserts that medication access is a key factor in addressing healthcare disparities for people with lower incomes. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The text notes that protecting access to medication abortion is important for people living with disabilities. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The text notes that medication access is essential for reducing health disparities among people of color.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The resolution advocates for preserving and expanding access to medication abortion via telemedicine and mail-order. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Ensuring mifepristone remains accessible through various methods helps reduce barriers to essential healthcare.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution states that maintaining access helps combat reproductive health disparities that disproportionately affect Black and Indigenous people. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The text notes that protecting medication access is important for people living with disabilities. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The resolution notes that maintaining access is vital for people with lower incomes who face systemic healthcare inequities.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution calls for FDA policies to be based on transparent, peer-reviewed science rather than political interference.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 5/21/2026
- 30 Cosponsors added.
- 5/14/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Katherine ClarkDemocrat · Massachusetts
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Gregory MeeksDemocrat · New York
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Nellie PouDemocrat · New Jersey
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida