Roger Williams (R-TX)
Expressing support for the designation of July 15, 2026, as "Glioblastoma Awareness Day".
A Republican resolution with 20 Democratic cosponsors · See all 30 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for designating July 15, 2026, as "Glioblastoma Awareness Day." It highlights that glioblastoma is a highly aggressive and deadly brain tumor with a low 5-year survival rate. The text notes the high out-of-pocket medical costs faced by patients and the lack of screening methods. It also mentions the importance of research, including the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network. Finally, the resolution encourages public awareness, honors those affected by the disease, and supports continued investments in research and better treatments.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +3
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The resolution supports research and the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network to advance treatments and improve patient prognosis.
- Scored +3
Does this put more money into medical research?
The resolution encourages continued investments in glioblastoma research and the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network.
- Scored +2
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The resolution supports the development of treatments for a devastating disease that impacts cognitive and physical function.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Public Awareness: The resolution encourages increased public awareness regarding the urgent medical needs of patients and opportunities for research and treatment advances. (Resolution clauses 2 and the preamble)
-
Improved Treatment and Prognosis: The resolution supports efforts to develop better treatments intended to improve the long-term prognosis and quality of life for those diagnosed with the disease. (Resolution clause 4)
-
Recognition of Diagnosis Methods: It recognizes the importance of molecular biomarker testing for the diagnosis and treatment of glioblastoma. (Resolution clause 5)
-
Support for Caregivers and Families: The resolution expresses support for individuals battling brain tumors as well as their families, friends, and caregivers. (Resolution clause 6)
-
Encouragement of Research Investment: It encourages continued investments in glioblastoma research and treatments, specifically mentioning the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network. (Resolution clause 8)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Financial Burden: The text notes that brain cancer patients pay the second highest out-of-pocket costs for medical services during the initial and end-of-life phases of care. (Preamble)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution supports research and the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network to advance treatments and improve patient prognosis. Does this put more money into medical research? — The resolution encourages continued investments in glioblastoma research and the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The resolution supports the development of treatments for a devastating disease that impacts cognitive and physical function. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — By supporting research into treatments for high-cost medical conditions, it aims to address the financial burden of care. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The resolution's focus on research may eventually help mitigate the high out-of-pocket costs associated with glioblastoma.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/19/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Scott FranklinRepublican · Florida
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Brian MastRepublican · Florida
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Michael SimpsonRepublican · Idaho
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts