Tracey Mann (R-KS)
Recognizing April 2026 as "Distracted Driving Awareness Month" and promoting efforts to help prevent tragic and preventable crashes, deaths, and injuries caused by distracted driving.
A Republican resolution with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 16 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes April 2026 as "Distracted Driving Awareness Month." It aims to promote efforts to prevent crashes, deaths, and injuries caused by distracted driving. The text highlights that distracted driving, including the use of mobile devices, is a leading cause of preventable accidents. It supports various government agencies in their efforts to educate the public and increase roadway safety. Finally, the resolution urges citizens to take personal preventive steps to stay focused on the road.
Yes· 3 of 27
- Scored +1
Would children be better off under this?
Increased roadway safety through distracted driving awareness benefits children who are pedestrians and passengers.
- Scored +1
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Reducing distracted driving may save the lives of young adults who are statistically high-risk drivers.
- Scored +1
Would people in middle age be better off under this?
The emphasis on driving safety provides a positive impact on middle-aged drivers and commuters.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Awareness of Dangers: By recognizing "Distracted Driving Awareness Month," the resolution aims to raise awareness about the dangers of distracted driving (Section 1).
-
Support for Safety Efforts: The resolution supports the work of the Department of Transportation, State departments of transportation, and local governments to prevent distracted driving and save lives (Section 2).
-
Encouragement of Safer Driving Habits: The resolution urges people to take specific preventive steps, such as putting phones away or using "Do Not Disturb" features, to help stay focused on the road (Section 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Increased public safety efforts benefit all demographics sharing the road. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Increased public safety efforts benefit all demographics sharing the road. Would children be better off under this? — Increased roadway safety through distracted driving awareness benefits children who are pedestrians and passengers. Would farmers be better off under this? — Reducing distracted driving can improve safety for farmers frequently traveling on rural roads. Would gun owners be better off under this? — The resolution focuses on roadway safety which benefits all drivers regardless of other interests. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Improved road safety reduces the likelihood of expensive traffic-related injuries and property damage. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Increased public safety efforts benefit all demographics sharing the road. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Enhanced road safety and awareness helps all residents navigate public spaces more safely. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Improved roadway safety provides a safer environment for all community members. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Reducing preventable car crashes can help mitigate sudden financial losses for low-income families. Would men be better off under this? — The promotion of safer driving habits benefits all men commuting or traveling. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — The emphasis on driving safety provides a positive impact on middle-aged drivers and commuters. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Safer roads reduce the risk of costly accidents for middle-income drivers. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Increased public safety efforts benefit all demographics sharing the road. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Safer roads and more focused drivers create a more secure environment for pedestrians with disabilities. Would retired people be better off under this? — Increased roadway awareness supports a safer environment for retired individuals driving or walking. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Improved driving safety is beneficial for those living in areas where roads may have fewer safety features. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Enhanced roadway safety through distraction reduction benefits senior citizens as drivers and pedestrians. Would students be better off under this? — The focus on driving awareness benefits students who frequently drive or walk to school. Would union members be better off under this? — The resolution promotes safer road environments for all workers during their commutes. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Lowering distraction risks improves safety for high-density urban pedestrians and drivers. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Safer roads and reduced accident risks benefit veterans in their daily travels. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Increased public safety efforts benefit all demographics sharing the road. Would women be better off under this? — The promotion of safer driving habits benefits all women commuting or traveling. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Reducing distracted driving may save the lives of young adults who are statistically high-risk drivers.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — The resolution supports safety efforts on roadways which enhances the practical utility of national infrastructure.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The resolution's focus on road safety may slightly reduce the economic burden of traffic accidents on vulnerable populations.
- 4/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 15 Cosponsors added.
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Scott FranklinRepublican · Florida
Kimberlyn King-HindsRepublican · Northern Mariana Islands
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
James MoylanRepublican · Guam
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada