Lois Frankel (D-FL)
Recognizing community water fluoridation as a safe, effective public health intervention to prevent tooth decay and promote oral and physical health.
A Democratic resolution with 15 Democratic cosponsors · See all 15 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution aims to recognize community water fluoridation as a safe and effective public health intervention. It highlights how fluoride helps prevent tooth decay and promotes both oral and physical health. The text notes that tooth decay can lead to serious medical issues, including death and expensive emergency room visits. It also emphasizes the cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation for communities and individuals. Finally, the resolution encourages states and local governments to maintain or start fluoridation at recommended levels.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +7
Would children be better off under this?
The resolution highlights significant dental health benefits for children and notes risks associated with lack of fluoride for this group.
- Scored +7
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The resolution states that fluoridation is an equitable way to deliver care and protects low-income families from dental health risks.
- Scored +5
Does this lower what a hospital stay costs?
The resolution notes that water fluoridation can save billions in dental treatment costs and reduce hospitalizations related to dental infections.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Prevention of Tooth Decay: Fluoride is described as an essential component that can reduce tooth decay by about 25 percent (Whereas clause regarding fluoride).
-
Reduced Health Risks: By preventing tooth decay, the intervention may help prevent serious issues such as infections, heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and even death (Whereas clauses regarding tooth decay).
-
Financial Savings for Individuals: Communities with water fluoridation save an average of $32 per person annually by avoiding dental treatment costs and reducing missed work or school days (Whereas clause regarding CDC data).
-
Accessibility of Care: Water fluoridation is cited as a cost-effective and equitable way to deliver oral health care to people regardless of their income or access to regular dental services (Whereas clause regarding cost-effectiveness).
-
Encouragement of Optimal Levels: The resolution encourages states and localities to maintain water fluoridation at levels recommended by the World Health Organization and the American Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research (Resolution section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Fluoridation is described as an equitable and accessible means of delivering preventive oral healthcare to all populations. Does this put more money into medical research? — The resolution supports continued research and investment in community water fluoridation programs. Does this lower what a hospital stay costs? — The resolution notes that water fluoridation can save billions in dental treatment costs and reduce hospitalizations related to dental infections.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The resolution highlights significant dental health benefits for children and notes risks associated with lack of fluoride for this group. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The resolution states that fluoridation is an equitable way to deliver care and protects low-income families from dental health risks.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The resolution supports continued research and education regarding water fluoridation programs.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/26/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Kelly MorrisonDemocrat · Minnesota
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida