A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Safe Baby Formula Act of 2026," directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to take action regarding heavy metals in infant formula. It requires a study on how arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead impact infant health to be completed within one year. Additionally, the Secretary must establish evidence-based action levels for these specific substances within 90 days. When setting these levels, the Secretary must consider compliance feasibility, enforcement capacity for imports, and domestic food security.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +7
Would children be better off under this?
The bill directly addresses the safety of infant nutrition by targeting toxic heavy metals in formula.
- Scored +4
Would women be better off under this?
The bill addresses a critical component of infant care and maternal health concerns regarding nutrition safety.
- Scored +4
Does this put more money into medical research?
The bill mandates a specific study on the health impacts of heavy metals in infant formula.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this make child care cost less?
The bill notes that establishing heavy metal action levels must consider impacts on domestic food security, which could affect formula availability.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Health Research: The Secretary of Health and Human Services will complete a study on the impacts of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead in infant formula on infant health (Section 2). This provides a better understanding of how these substances affect babies.
-
Regulated Safety Standards: The Secretary is required to establish evidence-based action levels for arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead in infant formula (Section 3(a)). This creates specific standards for these substances in products used by infants.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Food Security Concerns: The Secretary must consider the impact of establishing action levels on domestic food security (Section 3(b)(3)). This suggests that setting certain standards could potentially affect the availability or security of the food supply.
-
Compliance and Enforcement Challenges: The Secretary must consider how feasible it is to comply with action levels and the department's capacity to enforce them for imported food (Section 3(b)(1) and Section 3(b)(2)). This implies there could be difficulties or burdens related to following or enforcing these new standards.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill directly addresses the safety of infant nutrition by targeting toxic heavy metals in formula. Would women be better off under this? — The bill addresses a critical component of infant care and maternal health concerns regarding nutrition safety. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Protecting infant health through food standards provides a benefit to all families, though the bill notes a need to consider food security impacts.
- Healthcare
- Does this put more money into medical research? — The bill mandates a specific study on the health impacts of heavy metals in infant formula. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill aims to improve infant health safety by establishing standards for heavy metals in formula.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make child care cost less? — The bill notes that establishing heavy metal action levels must consider impacts on domestic food security, which could affect formula availability.
- 7/27/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Introduced in House