A Republican bill with 12 Democratic cosponsors · See all 33 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is titled the Wildfire Reduction Market Expansion Act of 2026. It amends the Clean Air Act to change the definition of renewable biomass for the renewable fuel standard. The bill modifies the types of materials generated from forest and wood products manufacturing that qualify as renewable biomass under Section 2. It also updates the categories of trees, shrubs, and parts of trees or shrubs from non-Federal land, public lands, and Indian lands that qualify as renewable biomass. Additionally, the text includes provisions for certifications by landowners or the Departments of Agriculture or the Interior, alongside a savings clause regarding forest plans.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +7
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The bill facilitates the removal of hazardous fuels and supports ecological restoration on public lands.
- Scored +7
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Rural residents benefit from wildfire risk reduction and expanded local forestry markets.
- Scored +6
Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?
Expanding eligible biomass materials creates greater economic incentive for renewable fuel production.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2: This section includes materials generated from forest products manufacturing and wood products manufacturing, such as wood residuals, paper residuals, sawdust, wood, wood chips, shavings, bark, sanderdust, and paper recycling residuals, as renewable biomass. This is positive because it utilizes manufacturing by-products that might otherwise go to waste.
-
Section 2: This section includes trees, shrubs, and parts of trees or shrubs from non-Federal land managed under a forest sustainability certification program, classified as forest land for taxes, or certified by the landowner for long-term timber production. This provides clear pathways for private landowners to utilize forestry materials.
-
Section 2: This section includes vegetation obtained from within defensible space of a structure or infrastructure asset, or from wildfire risk reduction activities within the wildland-urban interface. This is beneficial as it encourages clearing materials that pose wildfire risks around buildings and communities.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 2: This section requires specific certifications from the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Interior, or non-Federal landowners, including letters given to persons seeking to generate credits. This administrative requirement creates additional paperwork burdens for individuals and government offices seeking to participate.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The bill facilitates the removal of hazardous fuels and supports ecological restoration on public lands. Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill provides economic opportunities for rural landowners and forest industries. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — Expanding eligible biomass materials creates greater economic incentive for renewable fuel production. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill encourages fuel reduction and ecological restoration projects to reduce wildfire risk. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Increasing the availability of renewable biomass for fuel helps displace fossil fuels. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — Increased biomass use potentially reduces reliance on petroleum-based fuels.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Rural residents benefit from wildfire risk reduction and expanded local forestry markets. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill explicitly includes materials from Tribal lands, providing economic opportunities for Native communities. Would business owners be better off under this? — Wood products and bioenergy business owners can expand their eligible raw material sources. Would farmers be better off under this? — Landowners classified for forestry tax purposes benefit from expanded biomass utility.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Small-scale wood products manufacturers and biomass collectors benefit from expanded eligibility of their materials. Is this likely to create jobs? — Expanding the definition of renewable biomass may increase demand for biomass collection and processing jobs. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill stimulates the bioenergy market by expanding the types of eligible materials for renewable fuel standards.
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/30/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
James ClyburnDemocrat · South Carolina
Kat CammackRepublican · Florida
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Mike EzellRepublican · Mississippi
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
James GallagherRepublican · California
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Trent KellyRepublican · Mississippi
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Julia LetlowRepublican · Louisiana
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mike RogersRepublican · Alabama
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Austin ScottRepublican · Georgia
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Bruce WestermanRepublican · Arkansas