A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "BRRRRT Act of 2026," establishes specific requirements for the Department of Defense regarding the A-10 aircraft fleet. It limits the divestment of A-10 aircraft to ensure a minimum inventory and operational capacity is maintained through fiscal year 2033. The Act mandates the preservation of retired aircraft in a recoverable condition and requires a roadmap for fleet sustainment. It also protects training functions at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base and Nellis Air Force Base. Additionally, the bill directs the creation of an A-10 demonstration team and a program to preserve technical and historical knowledge.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +3
Is this likely to create jobs?
The bill supports aircraft maintenance, training, and logistics capacity which helps sustain specialized military jobs.
- Scored +2
Does this put more money into scientific research?
The bill encourages competitive experimentation and prototyping in autonomous and AI-enabled technologies.
- Scored +2
Does this send more money or help to other countries?
The bill discusses the possibility of transferring A-10 aircraft to eligible foreign partners as security cooperation.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -3
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?
The bill mandates the preservation and potential reconstitution of aircraft, which increases spending.
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
The bill mandates maintaining and restoring aircraft capacity, which likely increases required defense spending.
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
By preventing divestment and requiring capacity restoration, the bill increases long-term government expenditures.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Maintaining Aircraft Inventory: The bill prevents the total A-10 inventory from falling below levels necessary for operational employment, pilot production, and testing through fiscal year 2033 (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Protecting Training and Jobs: By requiring the Secretary of the Air Force to maintain sufficient training, maintenance, and logistics capacity, the bill helps ensure the operational viability of the fleet (Section 2(a)(3) and Section 3(b)(1)).
-
Preserving Military Bases: The bill restricts the transition of training functions away from Davis-Monthan Air Force Base unless specific feasibility and cost conditions are met (Section 3(a)(2)).
-
Preserving Knowledge and History: The establishment of a program to collect oral histories and digital archives helps preserve the technical and historical knowledge of those who operated and maintained the A-10 (Section 3(e)).
-
Promoting Heritage and Outreach: The creation of an A-10 demonstration team is intended to honor the combat legacy of the aircraft and promote pride in the United States Air Force (Section 4(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Divestment: The Secretary of Defense is prohibited from waiving certain requirements unless a fully capable replacement has achieved full operational capability, which could delay the transition to newer systems (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Mandatory Capacity Restoration: If the Air Force previously reduced capacity in anticipation of retirement, they are required to submit a plan to restore that capacity, which may impact existing budget or personnel allocations (Section 2(a)(4)).
-
Strict Preservation Requirements: The requirement to maintain retired aircraft in a recoverable condition and the prohibition on cannibalizing certain aircraft may impact how the military manages its existing spare parts and resources (Section 2(c)(1) and Section 2(c)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill supports aircraft maintenance, training, and logistics capacity which helps sustain specialized military jobs. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — By preventing divestment and requiring capacity restoration, the bill increases long-term government expenditures. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — The bill mandates maintaining and restoring aircraft capacity, which likely increases required defense spending. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — The requirement to maintain specific inventories and restore capacity adds long-term fiscal obligations.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The bill encourages competitive experimentation and prototyping in autonomous and AI-enabled technologies.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires several annual reports and briefings to congressional committees. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill places specific mandates and restrictions on the Department of Defense regarding aircraft inventory.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides opportunities for nontraditional defense contractors and technology firms.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this send more money or help to other countries? — The bill discusses the possibility of transferring A-10 aircraft to eligible foreign partners as security cooperation. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The potential for foreign military sales and transfers can strengthen defense-related international partnerships. Does this reduce what is spent on the military? — The bill mandates the preservation and potential reconstitution of aircraft, which increases spending.
- 7/20/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Sam GravesRepublican · Missouri
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin