A Republican bill with 7 Democratic cosponsors · See all 9 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the ``Epstein Files Transparency Act II'', seeks to amend existing law regarding the Epstein Files Transparency Act. It specifically focuses on how the Attorney General of the United States enforces transparency regarding investigative materials. The legislation expands the ability of State attorneys general, district attorneys, and victims to take legal action against the Attorney General for withholding or redacting records. It also establishes new protocols for accessing unredacted records for investigations and congressional review. Furthermore, the bill introduces penalties for Department of Justice employees who mishandle these records.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +9
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill significantly expands transparency by allowing victims, state officials, and Congress to access unredacted investigative records.
- Scored +5
Would women be better off under this?
The bill empowers victims of sex trafficking and sexual abuse to access their own investigative records.
- Scored +2
Does this change how police departments operate?
The bill increases accountability for Department of Justice employees through penalties for mishandling records.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The bill increases access to investigative files which could potentially impact the privacy of those mentioned in the records.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Empowers State Officials and Victims: The bill allows State attorneys general, district attorneys, and victims to bring legal actions against the Attorney General of the United States to obtain relief, including monetary relief and attorney's fees, if records are unlawfully withheld or redacted. (Section 2(a)(1) and Section 2(b)(3)(A))
-
Provides Fast-Track Legal Proceedings: Courts are required to advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of civil actions filed under this Act to the greatest extent practicable. (Section 2(a)(2) and Section 2(b)(3)(B))
-
Grants Victims Access to Personal Records: Victims have a right to request and receive full, unredacted records, documents, or communications that identify, describe, or relate to them, their parents, siblings, or legal guardians. (Section 2(b)(1))
-
Ensures Access for Criminal Investigations: State and local law enforcement can receive full, unredacted access to records for use in investigations or judicial proceedings. (Section 2(c)(1) and Section 2(c)(2))
-
Streamlines Congressional Oversight: Members of Congress can request full, unredacted access to described records and have a cause of action if the Attorney General fails to comply with the request. (Section 2(e)(1) and Section 2(e)(2))
-
Establishes Accountability for Officials: The bill sets penalties, including fines or imprisonment, for Department of Justice employees who conceal, destroy, or misrepresent information required under the Act. (Section 2(f)(1))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Privacy Risks for Other Victims: While a victim can access their own records, the Attorney General is permitted to redact portions of those records that contain personally identifiable information or medical files of other victims to prevent an invasion of privacy. (Section 2(b)(2)(A))
-
Restrictions on Public Disclosure of Classified Information: Although investigators can review classified records, the bill does not authorize the public release of such information outside of specific protocols. (Section 2(d)(5))
-
Limits on Victim Claims: The definition of a "victim" specifically excludes individuals whose claims arise from their own participation in, solicitation of, or benefit from the criminal conduct involving Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, unless that involvement originated from being trafficked or abused. (Section 2(g)(1)(B))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill significantly expands transparency by allowing victims, state officials, and Congress to access unredacted investigative records. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The bill increases access to investigative files which could potentially impact the privacy of those mentioned in the records.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill empowers victims of sex trafficking and sexual abuse to access their own investigative records.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill increases accountability for Department of Justice employees through penalties for mishandling records. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill does not directly address poverty reduction mechanisms. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill focuses on transparency of criminal investigations rather than specific racial equity outcomes.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill is unrelated to veterans' benefits.
- 11/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico