Mike Haridopolos (R-FL)
Space Ready 2.0 Act
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Space Ready 2.0 Act" allows the NASA Administrator to start a pilot program for public and private investment in infrastructure at NASA Centers. This program focuses on "common use infrastructure," such as roadways and pipelines, that benefits multiple users. The Administrator can enter into agreements to collect voluntary contributions from commercial entities and other government authorities to fund repairs, maintenance, and modernization. The bill requires cost transparency, the return of unspent funds to commercial partners, and regular reports to Congress. This authority to collect voluntary contributions ends on December 31, 2031.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +4
Would business owners be better off under this?
Provides a clear framework for commercial entities to invest in and utilize NASA infrastructure with fund protection.
- Scored +4
Does this put more into space exploration?
Directly improves the infrastructure necessary to support NASA and commercial space activities.
- Scored +3
Would billionaires be better off under this?
Benefits high-net-worth individuals invested in the commercial space industry.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Infrastructure: The bill allows for the renovation, rehabilitation, and modernization of NASA-owned infrastructure, which can support activities at NASA Centers (Section 3(b)(2)(A)).
-
Financial Protection for Businesses: Commercial entities are guaranteed the return of any unexpended funds in proportion to their original contribution once a project is finished (Section 3(b)(1)(D)) or within 90 days of a project becoming operational (Section 3(b)(2)(D)).
-
Accountability and Transparency: The Administrator must establish cost and schedule baselines and provide commercial entities with a final project cost breakdown upon completion (Section 3(b)(1)(B)).
-
Efficiency in Project Delivery: The Administrator is directed to use streamlined acquisition procedures to the maximum extent allowed by law (Section 3(b)(1)(C)(ii)).
-
Prevention of Waste: The Administrator must consult with other Federal, State, and local entities to ensure projects are not duplicative (Section 3(b)(2)(B)(i)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Budgetary Constraints: No contributions can be collected or accepted, and no agreements can be executed, unless the amounts are provided in advance in an appropriations Act (Section 3(b)(1)(A)).
-
Risk of Cost Overruns: While the Administrator should try to stay within cost estimates, the bill requires agreements to simply determine which entity covers the costs if overruns or delays occur, meaning commercial entities or the government could still face unexpected costs (Section 3(b)(1)(F)(iii)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Provides a clear framework for commercial entities to invest in and utilize NASA infrastructure with fund protection. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Benefits high-net-worth individuals invested in the commercial space industry. Would union members be better off under this? — Potential for increased construction work on NASA centers.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — Enhances capabilities for commercial space activities through improved shared infrastructure. Is this likely to create jobs? — Infrastructure modernization projects at NASA centers are likely to create construction and engineering jobs. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Requires cost transparency, baselines, and prohibits new budget authority in advance of appropriations. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — Allows for private voluntary contributions to fund infrastructure that might otherwise be fully taxpayer-funded.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more into space exploration? — Directly improves the infrastructure necessary to support NASA and commercial space activities. Does this put more money into scientific research? — Modernized infrastructure supports the operational capacity for scientific and space exploration activities.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — Specifically authorizes the modernization of roadways and pipelines at NASA Centers.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires reporting to Congress and detailed cost breakdowns for commercial entities.
- 10/5/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Vince FongRepublican · California
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California