Eleanor Norton (D-DC)
No Fencing at Lafayette Square Act
A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the No Fencing at Lafayette Square Act. It stops the use of Federal, State, foreign, or private money to put up permanent fencing around Lafayette Square. Lafayette Square is a Federal park in Washington, DC, that sits between H Street Northwest, Madison Place Northwest, Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, and Jackson Place Northwest. The bill does not stop people from fixing or replacing fencing that was already there when this Act was passed.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +2
Would people in cities be better off under this?
Residents of Washington, DC, retain unimpeded access to Lafayette Square without the imposition of permanent new fencing.
- Scored +2
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The legislation ensures that a prominent federal park in Washington, DC, remains free from permanent blockading structures.
- Scored +2
Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?
Keeping public squares free from permanent physical barriers safeguards public spaces traditionally used for civic engagement and expression.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Keeping the park open without permanent new fences: Section 2(a) bans using Federal, State, foreign, or private funds to install permanent fencing around Lafayette Square, which could keep the area open and free from new permanent blockades.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts found: The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in cities be better off under this? — Residents of Washington, DC, retain unimpeded access to Lafayette Square without the imposition of permanent new fencing.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The legislation ensures that a prominent federal park in Washington, DC, remains free from permanent blockading structures.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — Keeping public squares free from permanent physical barriers safeguards public spaces traditionally used for civic engagement and expression.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — By preventing permanent fencing around Lafayette Square, the bill helps preserve public access and open space for public assembly and expression.
- 7/6/2026
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E653-654)
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Introduced in House