A Democratic bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Spot the Fakes Act requires people who own or control AI-generated content to label it as AI-generated. This labeling must happen within the metadata of the output or through other technological means that provide verifiable proof of origin. The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology will help determine appropriate verification methods. The Federal Trade Commission, working with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, must issue regulations on how these labels are shown within six months of the enactment of the section. The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for enforcing these rules. Violating this requirement will be treated as an unfair or deceptive act or practice under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +7
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill protects consumers from deceptive practices by requiring labels on AI-generated content.
- Scored +5
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?
The bill imposes new regulatory requirements on those who control AI-generated content.
- Scored +4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill increases transparency regarding the origin of digital media through mandatory labeling.
The opposite
- Scored -4
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill imposes new regulatory compliance burdens and potential legal risks for those producing AI content.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Transparency for Consumers: Under Section 2(a), anyone who owns or controls AI-generated content must label it as AI-generated using metadata or other technological means. This is a positive step because it helps people easily know when they are looking at or listening to content created by artificial intelligence instead of a real person.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Risk of Penalties for Violations: Under Section 2(c), anyone who breaks the labeling rules will face enforcement actions from the Federal Trade Commission, as violations are treated as unfair or deceptive acts or practices. This could be a burden for individuals or groups who accidentally fail to label their AI content properly and now face federal penalties.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would high-income households be better off under this? — The transparency requirements provide a more predictable digital media environment. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Labeling requirements help prevent the spread of deceptive digital misinformation that can impact all socioeconomic groups. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill provides better information to consumers regarding the authenticity of digital content. Would billionaires be better off under this? — The bill creates a more regulated and predictable digital content environment. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — The bill creates more transparency in digital media landscapes. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — The bill establishes clear standards for digital content provenance. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill increases digital literacy and transparency for all media consumers. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill imposes new regulatory compliance burdens and potential legal risks for those producing AI content.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill protects consumers from deceptive practices by requiring labels on AI-generated content.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases transparency regarding the origin of digital media through mandatory labeling. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The focus on metadata and provenance helps establish clearer standards for digital content origins.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — The bill imposes new regulatory requirements on those who control AI-generated content.
- 10/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire