David Schweikert (R-AZ)
Enhanced Counter-Narcotics Detection and Technology Act
A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Enhanced Counter-Narcotics Detection and Technology Act. It directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to set up an annual process to identify high-risk land ports of entry on both the northern and southern borders based on drug seizure volume. Within one year of identification, large-scale, non-intrusive inspection technology must be put in place at these high-risk ports to screen cargo, unless the Commissioner decides it is not effective. Once this technology is implemented, it must be used to screen at least 40 percent of eligible passenger vehicles and at0 least 70 percent of eligible commercial vehicles entering the United States at those ports. CBP personnel must also receive training on the new inspection technology, and the Commissioner is required to submit annual reports to Congress regarding its effectiveness.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +7
Does this tighten control of the border?
The legislation strengthens border security by mandating advanced non-intrusive inspection technology at high-risk ports of entry.
- Scored +5
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?
The bill enhances counter-narcotics detection and technology at land ports of entry, aiding in the interception of illicit drugs.
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The legislation requires annual reports to Congress regarding the effectiveness of the deployed inspection technology.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2, adding Section 420(a) and (b): This provision requires the identification of high-risk land ports of entry based on drug seizure volumes on both the northern and southern borders, which directly focuses attention on the areas most heavily impacted by illegal substances.
-
Section 2, adding Section 420(c) and (d): This section mandates the implementation of large-scale, non-intrusive inspection technology and requires the screening of at least 40 percent of passenger vehicles and 70 percent of commercial vehicles at high-risk ports, which could improve safety and security for the American people by better detecting contraband.
-
Section 2, adding Section 420(e) and (g): These provisions ensure that U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel receive proper training on the new technology and that reports are submitted to Congress annually, holding officials accountable for tracking the effectiveness of these security tools.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Based on the provided text, there are no explicit negative consequences or burdens identified for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — The legislation strengthens border security by mandating advanced non-intrusive inspection technology at high-risk ports of entry.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The legislation requires annual reports to Congress regarding the effectiveness of the deployed inspection technology. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill directs the Department of Homeland Security and CBP to establish federal screening mandates at land ports of entry.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — The bill enhances counter-narcotics detection and technology at land ports of entry, aiding in the interception of illicit drugs.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Reducing illegal drug flow across borders contributes to safer communities for families and children. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Enhanced counter-narcotics efforts help protect young adults from substance abuse and related risks.
- 7/7/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
- 6/30/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Introduced in House