Andrea Salinas (D-OR)

NO PROFIT Act

H.R. 9529 · House bill Taxation

A Democratic bill with no cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The "NO PROFIT Act" amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax net capital gains earned while serving as President of the United States. It imposes a 100 percent tax on qualified net capital gains for any taxable year in which the individual served as President. Assets not held in a qualified blind trust are subject to these rules, including a "mark to market" requirement where gains or losses are recognized as if the asset were sold at the end of the taxable year. This act applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.

Yes

  • Scored +5

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    Discourages personal financial gain from office, indirectly promoting integrity and reducing conflict of interest.

  • Scored +5

    Does this raise taxes on the highest earners?

    Imposes a 100% tax on capital gains for the President, who is typically a high-net-worth individual.

  • Scored +1

    Does this reduce what the federal government owes?

    Increases federal revenue through a high tax on presidential capital gains, though the impact is minimal due to the small number of taxpayers.

The opposite· 3 of 5

  • Scored -10

    Does this cut the tax on profits from selling investments?

    Significantly increases the capital gains tax to 100% for the President.

  • Scored -5

    Would high-income households be better off under this?

    Specifically targets the highest possible income bracket (the President) with a prohibitive tax.

  • Scored -5

    Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?

    Creates a significant financial penalty for capital gains for the President.