Dina Titus (D-NV)
Air Carrier Access Amendments Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 7 Democratic cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Air Carrier Access Amendments Act of 2026. It aims to update protections for air transportation passengers with disabilities who face discrimination. The text notes that travelers with disabilities still face major barriers like damaged assistive devices and inaccessible aircraft. It allows the government to assess civil penalties for specific violations against passengers with disabilities. Additionally, the legislation gives aggrieved individuals the right to bring a civil action against air carriers in a United States district court.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +10
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
Directly provides enhanced legal protections and financial remedies for disability-based discrimination.
- Scored +10
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?
Provides significant new legal remedies and penalties to protect passengers with disabilities from discrimination.
- Scored +7
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The bill explicitly mentions veterans as a group that continues to experience barriers in air transportation.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Would business owners be better off under this?
Air carriers (businesses) face new civil penalties and legal liabilities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Civil Action for Aggrieved Persons: Under Section 3, adding subsection (d)(1), any person aggrieved by a violation can bring a civil action in a United States district court for appropriate relief, including compensatory and punitive damages. This is positive because it gives passengers a direct legal path to hold airlines accountable.
-
Recovery of Costs and Fees: Under Section 3, adding subsection (d)(1)(B), a court shall award reasonable attorney's fees, reasonable expert fees, and court costs to the prevailing party. This is beneficial because it helps everyday people afford the legal help they need to fight airline discrimination.
-
Mandatory Civil Penalties for Specific Violations: Under Section 3, amending subsection (c)(1)(C), the Secretary must assess a civil penalty for minimum violations such as the delay of, loss of, or significant damage to a wheelchair or scooter, or physical harm to a passenger. This is positive because it directly penalizes airlines for damaging critical equipment or hurting travelers.
-
No Requirement to Exhaust Administrative Remedies: Under Section 3, adding subsection (d)(1)(C), an aggrieved person is not required to exhaust administrative remedies before bringing a civil action. This is a positive step because it cuts through red tape and lets victims go straight to court.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no explicitly stated negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Directly provides enhanced legal protections and financial remedies for disability-based discrimination. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill explicitly mentions veterans as a group that continues to experience barriers in air transportation. Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees who use wheelchairs or scooters benefit from increased carrier accountability. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors are more likely to utilize assistive devices like scooters and wheelchairs in air travel. Would business owners be better off under this? — Air carriers (businesses) face new civil penalties and legal liabilities.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — Provides significant new legal remedies and penalties to protect passengers with disabilities from discrimination.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Increases accountability for air carriers regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Establishes a private right of action for aggrieved persons to seek judicial relief. Does this give the federal government more power? — Grants the Attorney General and courts more authority to enforce civil rights in air travel.
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia