A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The AI-Related Job Impacts Clarity Act requires certain entities to disclose how artificial intelligence affects their workforce. Covered entities must report data regarding layoffs, new hires, unfilled positions, and retraining efforts linked to artificial intelligence. These disclosures must include North American Industry Classification System codes and be submitted quarterly. The Secretary of Labor will then prepare reports summarizing and analyzing this data. These reports are to be published on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website and submitted to Congress. The Act also allows for future regulations to include certain non-publicly-traded companies.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires the Secretary of Labor to publish quarterly reports on AI-related job impacts on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website.
- Scored +3
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill provides critical data on how artificial intelligence is impacting job security and retraining needs.
- Scored +2
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill provides transparency regarding automation-related layoffs which affects low-income workers.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill imposes new quarterly reporting requirements and potential future regulatory scope for non-publicly-traded companies.
- Scored -2
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill creates a potential regulatory and reporting burden for non-publicly-traded companies based on future regulations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Transparency of Job Changes: Covered entities must disclose the number of individuals laid off, hired, or not rehired due to artificial intelligence (Section 2(a)(1)). This provides insight into how automation is changing the workforce.
-
Tracking Retraining Efforts: The bill requires disclosure of the number of individuals being retrained or assisted in retraining due to artificial intelligence (Section 2(a)(1)(D)). This tracks how companies are helping workers adapt to new technology.
-
Public Access to Workforce Data: The Secretary must publish quarterly reports and the underlying data on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website (Section 2(b)(3)(A)). This ensures the public can access information regarding AI-related job impacts.
-
Protection of Sensitive Information: For non-publicly-traded companies, the Secretary is tasked with establishing procedures for confidential submission to protect proprietary or personally identifiable information (Section 2(c)(2)(D)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Compliance Burdens for Companies: Covered entities are required to disclose specific data regarding layoffs, hires, and unfilled positions every quarter (Section 2(a)(1)). This creates a recurring reporting obligation.
-
Regulatory Uncertainty for Non-Public Companies: Non-publicly-traded companies may be included in these reporting requirements based on future regulations regarding their size, revenue, or employment impact (Section 2(c)(1) and Section 2(c)(2)(A)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Secretary of Labor to publish quarterly reports on AI-related job impacts on the Bureau of Labor Statistics website.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The bill provides critical data on how artificial intelligence is impacting job security and retraining needs. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill provides transparency regarding automation-related layoffs which affects low-income workers. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill imposes new quarterly reporting requirements and potential future regulatory scope for non-publicly-traded companies.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill tracks job creation related to AI but does not directly stimulate it. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill creates a potential regulatory and reporting burden for non-publicly-traded companies based on future regulations.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
James MoylanRepublican · Guam
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia