Tracey Mann (R-KS)
To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct a study to assess whether certain aircraft certified under part 23 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, may be used in operations conducted under part 121 of such title, and for other purposes.
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill requires the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to start a study within 180 days of the bill's enactment. The study will assess and evaluate if certain aircraft with at least 10 passenger seats and not more than 19 seats can be safely used in commercial air service. Specifically, it looks at aircraft type certificated under part 23 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, after August 30, 2017. The Administrator must consider changing aircraft economics for operators serving small communities and evaluate foreign regulatory frameworks. Technical advice and comments must also be solicited from aircraft manufacturers, representatives of small or rural communities, and aviation safety experts. Finally, the Administrator must submit a report on the study's findings to specific committees in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +2
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The bill specifically seeks input from and addresses the needs of small, rural, and remote communities experiencing reduced air service.
- Scored +2
Does this make it easier to do business across state lines?
The legislation evaluates regulations affecting commercial air carriers operating across state lines.
- Scored +2
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The study considers aircraft economics for operators serving small communities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 1(b)(1) requires the Administrator to consider the impacts of changing aircraft economics for operators providing scheduled commercial air service to small communities. This is positive because it looks directly at how air service costs and availability affect smaller towns.
-
Section 1(b)(3)(B) requires the Administrator to solicit technical advice and comments from representatives of small, rural, and remote communities that have experienced a decrease in scheduled commercial air service, including communities receiving certain subsidies. This gives a direct voice to everyday people in areas losing flights.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no explicitly mentioned negative impacts or burdens placed on individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill specifically seeks input from and addresses the needs of small, rural, and remote communities experiencing reduced air service. Would business owners be better off under this? — Regional airline operators and small business communities could benefit from optimized air service regulations. Would farmers be better off under this? — Rural agricultural communities often rely on regional connectivity and may benefit from improved air access. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Residents in small communities may benefit from improved commercial flight options.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — The legislation evaluates regulations affecting commercial air carriers operating across state lines. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires a formal report to congressional committees regarding study findings. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill mandates the FAA Administrator to conduct a formal study and report to Congress.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The study considers aircraft economics for operators serving small communities. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill explores options to improve commercial air service economics for small communities, potentially aiding local commerce.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill directly addresses air transportation connectivity and challenges in small and rural communities.
- 6/9/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Ron EstesRepublican · Kansas
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island