Eleanor Norton (D-DC)
National Commission to Combat Workplace Sexual Harassment Act
A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill establishes the National Commission to Combat Workplace Sexual Harassment. The Commission is tasked with conducting a comprehensive study and investigation into workplace sexual harassment, assault, and misconduct across various industries in the United States. It will collect testimony from workers, employers, experts, and the public to analyze the causes, effects, and efficacy of current reporting mechanisms. After its study, the Commission must submit a final report with recommendations to the President and Congress. The Commission will consist of 11 appointed members and will terminate 60 days after submitting its report.
Yes· 3 of 19
- Scored +7
Would women be better off under this?
The bill focuses on combating sexual harassment and requires women to be the majority on the commission.
- Scored +6
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
The bill establishes a national commission to combat workplace sexual harassment with a requirement that at least 6 members be women.
- Scored +4
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill specifically investigates how low income renders individuals more vulnerable to harassment.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Broad Inclusion of Voices: The bill allows for testimony from a wide range of people, including workers and contractors in industries like hospitality, factories, agriculture, and technology, ensuring different workplace experiences are heard (Section 3(1)(A)(i)).
-
Focus on Vulnerable Groups: The Commission will specifically evaluate if personal characteristics, such as race, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, and income, or employment types, such as "gig" economy or seasonal work, make individuals more vulnerable to misconduct (Section 3(1)(B)(iii)).
-
Analysis of Modern Communication: The bill requires an evaluation of how new forms of communication, such as social media, affect workplace sexual harassment (Section 3(1)(B)(iv)).
-
Improving Accountability: By evaluating the efficacy of current reporting mechanisms and reviewing successful private and public sector policies, the bill aims to find better ways to prevent misconduct and enforce prohibitions (Section 3(1)(B)(vii) and (ix)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Lack of Immediate Action: The bill focuses on investigation and reporting rather than providing immediate legal remedies or protections for victims, as the Commission's primary duty is to study and recommend (Section 3).
-
Potential for Political Influence: The membership of the Commission is determined by appointments from the President and the leadership of the House and Senate, which could influence the direction of the findings (Section 4(a)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill focuses on combating sexual harassment and requires women to be the majority on the commission. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The bill specifically investigates vulnerabilities related to gender identity and sexual orientation. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill specifically investigates how low income renders individuals more vulnerable to harassment. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The commission evaluates how race contributes to vulnerability to sexual misconduct. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The commission evaluates how race contributes to vulnerability to sexual misconduct. Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill specifically lists agriculture as an industry to be investigated for sexual misconduct. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The commission evaluates how race contributes to vulnerability to sexual misconduct. Would men be better off under this? — Men also benefit from a comprehensive study on preventing workplace misconduct. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Middle-aged workers benefit from efforts to identify and combat workplace harassment. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — General improvement in workplace safety and accountability benefits the middle class. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The commission evaluates how race contributes to vulnerability to sexual misconduct. Would union members be better off under this? — Union workers benefit from an investigation into better reporting and accountability mechanisms. Would white Americans be better off under this? — General improvement in workplace safety benefits all employees. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults entering the workforce benefit from a study aimed at improving accountability for misconduct.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The bill establishes a national commission to combat workplace sexual harassment with a requirement that at least 6 members be women. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The commission specifically evaluates vulnerabilities related to gender identity and sexual orientation. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The commission investigates how race makes individuals more vulnerable to workplace misconduct.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires a comprehensive report and public hearing on the findings regarding sexual misconduct. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill creates a new federal commission to investigate issues across the United States.
- 6/8/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.