Christopher Smith (R-NJ)
Tibet Atrocities Determination Act
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Tibet Atrocities Determination Act. It requires the Secretary of State to make a formal determination within one year on whether the actions of the People's Republic of China against Tibetans are genocide or crimes against humanity. The Secretary must also submit a written report containing the evidence, a review of relevant policies, and recommendations for United States policy responses like sanctions and visa restrictions. The report can include consultations with human rights experts, nongovernmental organizations, and the Tibetan diaspora. Finally, the bill provides specific definitions for the scope of the determination and the geographic area of Tibet.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +7
Would Asian Americans be better off under this?
The bill directly advocates for the human rights and protection of Tibetans within the broader Asian demographic context.
- Scored +6
Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion?
The bill examines actions intended to repress Tibetan Buddhism, supporting international religious freedom.
- Scored +6
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?
The bill mandates official determinations and reporting by the Secretary of State regarding atrocities, shaping foreign policy responses.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2: Requiring the Secretary of State to determine whether acts against Tibetans constitute genocide or crimes against humanity holds officials accountable and brings official attention to severe suffering.
-
Section 3: This section requires a written report with recommendations for United States policy responses, including potential sanctions and visa restrictions, which aims to address and curb human rights abuses.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill directly advocates for the human rights and protection of Tibetans within the broader Asian demographic context. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The legislation supports the Tibetan diaspora and human rights victims seeking international recognition and protection.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion? — The bill examines actions intended to repress Tibetan Buddhism, supporting international religious freedom. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill addresses systemic human rights abuses and potential genocide against the Tibetan people, promoting international justice and equality.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — The bill mandates official determinations and reporting by the Secretary of State regarding atrocities, shaping foreign policy responses. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The legislation strengthens diplomatic focus on human rights in collaboration with international standards and advocacy groups.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill enhances government accountability and transparency by requiring detailed public reporting on human rights abuses. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill mandates specific reporting and determination duties for the federal executive branch.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York