David Taylor (R-OH)
Housing Regulatory Clarity Act of 2026
A Republican bill with 4 Republican cosponsors · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is titled the "Housing Regulatory Clarity Act of 2026." It focuses on the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. The legislation aims to prohibit the Secretary from considering disparate impact. This prohibition applies to any actions carried out by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Yes
- Scored +3
Would white Americans be better off under this?
Reducing the regulatory burden of disparate impact may benefit those not targeted by these specific civil rights enforcement actions.
- Scored +2
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
Limiting federal regulatory tools like disparate impact reduces the central government's power to enforce equitable outcomes.
The opposite· 3 of 8
- Scored -7
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The elimination of disparate impact consideration negatively impacts the ability to challenge housing discrimination that disproportionately affects Black Americans.
- Scored -7
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
Native Americans may face increased housing inequity without the protection of disparate impact regulations.
- Scored -7
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
Prohibiting the consideration of disparate impact removes a key legal tool used to address and prevent racial discrimination in housing.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific provisions in the provided text that describe positive outcomes or benefits for individuals or groups of people.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific provisions in the provided text that describe negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would white Americans be better off under this? — Reducing the regulatory burden of disparate impact may benefit those not targeted by these specific civil rights enforcement actions. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The elimination of disparate impact consideration negatively impacts the ability to challenge housing discrimination that disproportionately affects Black Americans. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Native Americans may face increased housing inequity without the protection of disparate impact regulations. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Removing disparate impact protections reduces the legal recourse for Hispanic Americans facing discriminatory housing practices. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill reduces the regulatory mechanisms used to prevent housing discrimination against Asian American communities. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill limits the ability of low-income groups to challenge discriminatory housing practices through the disparate impact doctrine.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Prohibiting the consideration of disparate impact removes a key legal tool used to address and prevent racial discrimination in housing. Does this make housing cost less? — Removing disparate impact analysis may reduce the regulatory pressure on developers to ensure housing accessibility for disadvantaged groups. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The reduction in protections against discriminatory housing practices could hinder efforts to lift marginalized populations out of poverty.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Limiting federal regulatory tools like disparate impact reduces the central government's power to enforce equitable outcomes.
- 5/20/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee