A Democratic bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to jointly award grants to eligible entities. The purpose of these grants is to improve access to, develop, or expand transportation services for individuals with substance use disorder. These transportation services will get individuals to or from substance use disorder treatment or supportive services at no cost to the individual. Eligible entities include nonprofits, government entities, Indian Tribes, and health centers. The bill outlines specific permitted uses of funds, application requirements, and reporting duties for grantees.
Yes· 3 of 19
- Scored +7
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?
The legislation directly targets transportation barriers associated with substance use disorder treatment and opioid recovery services.
- Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill specifically targets residents of low-income communities and individuals experiencing homelessness for free transit assistance.
- Scored +6
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill directly improves healthcare and treatment access by providing free transportation for individuals with substance use disorders.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Free transportation access: Section 2(a) provides that grants will be used to supply transportation, including first and last mile transportation, to or from substance use disorder treatment or supportive services at no cost to the covered individual. This helps people get the care they need without worrying about travel costs.
-
Flexible use for local needs: Section 2(b)(1) allows grant funds to be used for several practical purposes, such as providing prescheduled or on-demand rides, acquiring motor vehicles, paying for ridesharing or taxi services, and training personnel. This gives organizations the tools they need to reliably move people to their appointments.
-
Help for vulnerable populations: Section 2(h)(1) defines covered individuals to include people experiencing homelessness, those residing in low-income communities, and those living in communities where transportation is a barrier to health care. This ensures that the help is targeted directly to people who are struggling the most.
-
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Exclusion of involuntary treatment: Section 2(b)(2)(A) states that grant funds may not be used for transporting an individual to receive involuntary inpatient treatment. While this is a restriction, it means transport funds cannot be utilized for specific types of court-ordered or non-voluntary care scenarios.
- Law enforcement restriction: Section 2(b)(2)(B) prohibits law enforcement personnel from using grants awarded under this section. This means police or similar officials cannot use these specific funds to provide the transit services.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill specifically targets residents of low-income communities and individuals experiencing homelessness for free transit assistance. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Middle-aged individuals with substance use disorders gain access to crucial medical and support services. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill explicitly includes Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations as eligible entities for receiving grant funds. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill helps individuals living in remote or under-resourced communities where lack of transit hinders healthcare access. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults struggling with substance use disorders benefit directly from expanded no-cost transit options. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Minority communities disproportionately affected by healthcare access barriers and substance use disorders may benefit from targeted outreach. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Minority communities facing transportation and healthcare barriers benefit from expanded local transit funding. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Individuals facing mobility or health-related travel barriers receive assistance through expanded transit services. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban populations experiencing homelessness and transportation disparities receive dedicated street outreach and transit support. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Veterans dealing with substance use issues can benefit from improved community-based transportation to health services.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — The legislation directly targets transportation barriers associated with substance use disorder treatment and opioid recovery services. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill directly improves healthcare and treatment access by providing free transportation for individuals with substance use disorders.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill aids low-income individuals and those experiencing homelessness by removing travel cost barriers to essential health and support services. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — By coordinating with housing and homelessness programs, the bill helps vulnerable homeless populations access necessary health care.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — The bill expands transportation services and first/last mile transit options for marginalized communities. Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill assists individuals in communities where transportation poses a barrier to care, often including rural regions.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The legislation requires grantees to report performance measures and data to evaluate grant effectiveness. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill establishes a new joint federal grant program administered by HHS and HUD.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill allows grant funds to be used for training personnel and supporting transit-related positions.
- 5/20/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
David ValadaoRepublican · California