Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)
Lainie Jones Comprehensive Cancer Survivorship Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 25 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Lainie Jones Comprehensive Cancer Survivorship Act of 2026 aims to improve the health and quality of life for cancer survivors throughout their entire continuum of care. This bill seeks to address unmet needs following diagnosis, active treatment, and posttreatment stages. It proposes the creation of a minimum standard of care for survivorship regardless of cancer type or a survivor's background. Key provisions include developing an alternative payment model, providing employment assistance, and expanding Medicaid coverage for specific transitions and fertility services. Additionally, the act establishes an Office of Cancer Survivorship within the National Cancer Institute to oversee research and education.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +7
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill establishes a minimum standard of care for survivorship, including cancer care planning, coordination, and fertility services.
- Scored +6
Would children be better off under this?
The bill expands Medicaid coverage specifically for healthcare transitions for survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer.
- Scored +5
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill expands Medicaid and CHIP coverage for essential cancer-related services like fertility and transition care.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Care Coordination: The bill establishes cancer care planning and coordination services, which include developing written treatment plans to help transition patients from active treatment to survivorship care. (Section 4)
-
Employment Support: A program will be created to award grants for education and assistance to help survivors stay in, reenter, or navigate the workforce after a cancer diagnosis. (Section 7)
-
Enhanced Quality of Life: Through a comprehensive survivorship program, grants will be awarded to entities to help survivors engage in health-promoting activities, such as physical activity and nutrition education. (Section 8)
-
Medicaid Coverage for Transitions: Medicaid coverage will be expanded to include healthcare transitions for survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer, ensuring specialized follow-up care. (Section 10)
-
Fertility Preservation: The bill mandates Medicaid coverage for cancer fertility services, including treatment and long-term storage of fertility for those at risk of infertility due to cancer treatment. (Section 11)
-
Standardized Information: The Secretary will publish information resources to help patients and providers consolidate treatment history into personalized survivorship care plans. (Section 5)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No explicit negative impacts or burdens are stated within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill expands Medicaid coverage specifically for healthcare transitions for survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill expands Medicaid and CHIP coverage for essential cancer-related services like fertility and transition care. Would women be better off under this? — The bill mandates coverage for cancer fertility services, which is vital for reproductive health following cancer treatment. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill assists survivors in accessing supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes provisions to help overcome barriers to care for communities of color through grant-funded programs. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill aims to address the disparity in access to services faced by cancer survivors in rural areas.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill establishes a minimum standard of care for survivorship, including cancer care planning, coordination, and fertility services. Does this put more money into Medicaid, the health coverage for people on low incomes? — The bill expands Medicaid coverage to include healthcare transitions for childhood/adolescent cancer survivors and cancer fertility services.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill provides financial assistance and supportive services to help cancer survivors and their families navigate employment and medical leave.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill funds a program to provide education and assistance to help cancer survivors stay in or reenter the workforce.
- 11/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/17/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/22/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 5/21/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/14/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia