A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 18.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "DC ROADS Act," aims to stop the implementation of congestion tolls in Washington, D.C. It prevents the Council of the District of Columbia from enacting any such tolls and prohibits the Mayor from enforcing them. The legislation also amends the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to include this prohibition. A congestion toll is defined as any charge for entering or passing through a specific zone. These zones could include roadways, bridges, tunnels, approaches, or ramps within or entering the District of Columbia.
Yes· 3 of 20
- Scored +5
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Highly beneficial for those who must drive from outside the city to work or visit.
- Scored +5
Does this give the federal government more power?
Increases federal oversight by restricting the DC local government's legislative authority.
- Scored +4
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Prevents a regressive tax that would disproportionately affect lower-income drivers.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -3
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
Prevents a congestion toll which is typically used to reduce traffic volume and carbon emissions.
- Scored -3
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?
Removes an incentive for commuters to switch from cars to public transportation.
- Scored -2
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
May discourage shifts from private vehicles to public transit by removing a cost incentive.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Prevention of new driving charges: The bill stops the Council of the District of Columbia from enacting any act, resolution, or requirement that imposes a congestion toll (Section 2(a)). This prevents individuals from being charged for entry into or passing through certain geographic areas.
-
Prevention of toll enforcement: The bill ensures the Mayor of the District of Columbia cannot enforce requirements that impose a congestion toll (Section 2(a)). This provides a safeguard against the enforcement of such charges.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are listed in the text: The provided text focuses entirely on the prohibition of congestion tolls and does not contain information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Highly beneficial for those who must drive from outside the city to work or visit. Would business owners be better off under this? — Reduces operational costs for businesses that rely on vehicle transport into DC. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Prevents a regressive tax that would disproportionately affect lower-income drivers. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Saves commuters money by prohibiting additional driving charges. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Reduces cost of travel into DC. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Assists those who rely exclusively on vehicles for mobility. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Reduces cost of travel. Would farmers be better off under this? — Reduces costs for transporting agricultural goods into the city. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Reduces cost of travel. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Lowers costs for commuting adults. Would retired people be better off under this? — Reduces travel costs for those on fixed incomes. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Reduces financial barriers for seniors driving into the city. Would students be better off under this? — Lowers costs for students commuting to DC universities. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Reduces cost of travel. Would union members be better off under this? — Benefits blue-collar workers who commute by vehicle. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Lowers costs for young commuting professionals. Would people in cities be better off under this? — May lead to increased traffic congestion for those living within DC.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — Removes an incentive for commuters to switch from cars to public transportation. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Prevents a congestion toll which is typically used to reduce traffic volume and carbon emissions. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — May discourage shifts from private vehicles to public transit by removing a cost incentive. Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — Eliminates a potential funding stream for road and bridge maintenance in DC.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Increases federal oversight by restricting the DC local government's legislative authority. Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — Reduces costs for those traveling between states through DC.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Prevents additional costs for businesses delivering goods into DC via congestion tolls.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Avoids adding a financial burden to low-income drivers entering the city.
- 5/20/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 18.
- 5/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Introduced in House