A Republican bill with 9 Republican cosponsors · See all 9 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Bereaved Parents Rights Act," seeks to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act. It would require hospitals and freestanding birth centers to notify parents regarding their rights following a miscarriage or stillbirth. This notification must include options for private or common burial, cremation, or disposal by the facility. The notice must occur within six hours of the event or before the parent is discharged. If a parent chooses burial or cremation in writing, the facility must follow state fetal death disposition options. Finally, the bill allows individuals to bring civil actions for relief if these requirements are violated.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +5
Would women be better off under this?
The bill requires hospitals to notify mothers of their rights following a miscarriage or stillbirth.
- Scored +3
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The bill creates a specific legal avenue for individuals to bring civil actions for harm caused by non-compliance.
- Scored +2
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates formal notification of rights to parents in a clinical setting.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Notification of Rights: According to Section 2, paragraph (4)(A)(i), hospitals or freestanding birth centers must notify parents of their rights regarding a fetus following a miscarriage or stillbirth. This ensures parents are informed of options such as private or common burial, cremation, or disposal by the facility.
-
Legal Recourse: Under Section 2, paragraph (4)(B), any individual harmed by a violation of these requirements may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States for appropriate relief.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill requires hospitals to notify mothers of their rights following a miscarriage or stillbirth.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The bill creates a specific legal avenue for individuals to bring civil actions for harm caused by non-compliance. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates formal notification of rights to parents in a clinical setting.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill mandates that hospitals and birth centers provide information regarding fetal disposition rights to parents. Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65? — The bill amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act, which relates to Medicare hospital requirements.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Young KimRepublican · California
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York